Yeah, nothing wrong with the character, just the casting, and only in terms of race, seeing as Cumberbatch is clearly a talented actor.
Canada violation!That did seem to be the angle they had on it for a while; all three of the actors reported as being considered for the role were Hispanic. And then...I'll always found the Del Toro thing kinda baffling. "Well, Ricardo Montalban was Mexican, even if Khan wasn't, so . . . ."
Well, clearly they should have cast a Canadian as Kirk . . ..
Yeah, nothing wrong with the character, just the casting, and only in terms of race, seeing as Cumberbatch is clearly a talented actor.
But race is a very big deal in casting. I won't deny that Cumberbatch is talented, but his talent isn't so gigantic that they couldn't have found his equal or superior in Bollywood. I don't by the money argument because that's the second largest film industry on Earth.
It's risk aversion. But even worse than simple risk aversion, it's a far greater degree of risk aversion than there must have been when casting Ricardo Montalban.
I thought Orci's defense of casting Cumberbatch was very weak. He said he didn't want to cast a person of color as Khan because of the connotation that would have in his mind as othering Khan. But the problem with that thinking is that people of color are not "others." White people aren't supposed to be the default. And Khan isn't just a generic POC terrorist, but one of the most charismatic villains in movie history, written by Orci to be someone we're supposed to feel empathy for. It speaks to his lack of imagination on that front that he doesn't have faith in the audience to feel empathy for a non-white villain. At least with Montalban, he wasn't Indian, but he also wasn't a traditional Caucasian.
It was a missed opportunity for a franchise that used to pride itself on its diversity. It was a missed opportunity to improve upon the representation that was there originally.
Check out this talk on representation and why it matters so much and imagine even a fraction of the success Cumberbatch has had in the past few years being available to an Indian actor who would have played one of the most compelling characters in one of the largest worldwide franchises.
It had nothing to do with that. For better or worse, Paramount didn't want the image of a Western Asian man crashing an aerial vehicle into a major US city, spoiling one of its films.It speaks to his lack of imagination on that front that he doesn't have faith in the audience to feel empathy for a non-white villain.
Not even a little.but one of the most charismatic villains in movie history
Another one of those Star Trek myths. The past 50 years of Star Trek has been made up by mostly white men.It was a missed opportunity for a franchise that used to pride itself on its diversity.
And that's different how?Star Trek is now in danger of only using people of colour as set dressing.
More like held the torch at waist-level. And, in several areas, Star Trek has been behind the times since TNG.Having held the torch so high during the civil rights movement, Star Trek is now in danger of being left behind by more recent film franchises.
How is that any different from the last guy?
Nope.In 1966, Star Trek broke the race barrier by having a multi-ethnic cast, mostly in minor roles or just by being on film in the background.
DS9 and Voyagers broke the race and sex barriers in their own way.
In 1966, Star Trek broke the race barrier by having a multi-ethnic cast, mostly in minor roles or just by being on film in the background.
DS9 and Voyagers broke the race and sex barriers in their own way.
Or he had cosmetic surgery so he could move about London without Marcus noticing.For those who are still fretting over Cumberbatch's pasty white complexion ...
Imagine that Marcus miscalculated and woke up the wrong guy (or, in this timeline MontaKhan didn't survive the Big Sleep). Harrison realized the error and assumed the mantle of "Khan" to strike fear in the hearts of his new enemies.
Try it. It works for me.![]()
Which is why Saldana became an integral member of the bridge crew, with "moments of glory" of her own, and not just the ship's operator.I'm sure if you joined Starfleet, as one of the best of the best of the best, you didn't sign on just to say hailing frequencies open.
DS9 and Voyagers broke the race and sex barriers in their own way.
How? Women and black men had been portrayed in leadership roles before those shows came along. So what barriers were they breaking exactly?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.