[yt]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PG3NZjRv2nM&feature=related[/yt]
William Powell & Myrna Loy...they just don't make 'em like this anymore.
William Powell & Myrna Loy...they just don't make 'em like this anymore.
I did a little research myself. It's the end of "After the Thin Man." Haven't found a video yet, just some screen caps. They're here: http://themave.com/Powell/powloy/films/after/end.htmHaven't found your line yet, Captain Dago...but this video is really cute. Some great lines.
It's gar-an-TEED that the audience is going to think Nick Charles is the Thin Man if they're rash enough to keep that title.![]()
Then again, I'm sure people would have said the same thing about Sean Connery as Bond, or Bela Lugosi as Dracula, or Douglas Fairbanks as Zorro, or Jack Nicholson as the Joker, or William Shatner as Kirk . . . .
I figured someone would say something like this, and fair enough, too - in general, I agree. However, there are always exceptions, and IMHO The Thin Man is one of them. That godawful excuse for an Avengers movie demonstrated quite clearly that, among other things, chemistry and the various nuances particular actors bring to a role cannot be faked or manufactured (casting someone as completely devoid of charisma as Ralph Feinnes and as utterly talentless as Uma Thurman merely compounded the problem; together they had all the chemistry of house bricks). The Thin Man movies are hardly great art and remaking them wouldn't be the end of the world or anything, but the originals had that same sort of je ne sais quoi (IMO, anywayI think the idea of someone being "irreplaceable" is silly. Nora was created by Dashiell Hammett, whose characters have been interpreted numerous times by different actors (and, in the case of the Thin Man movies, radically revised into a comedy). The great roles in the theatre have been played by thousands of different people.
Then again, I'm sure people would have said the same thing about Sean Connery as Bond, or Bela Lugosi as Dracula, or Douglas Fairbanks as Zorro, or Jack Nicholson as the Joker, or William Shatner as Kirk . . . .
I figured someone would say something like this, and fair enough, too - in general, I agree. However, there are always exceptions, and IMHO The Thin Man is one of them. That godawful excuse for an Avengers movie demonstrated quite clearly that, among other things, chemistry and the various nuances particular actors bring to a role cannot be faked or manufactured (casting someone as completely devoid of charisma as Ralph Feinnes and as utterly talentless as Uma Thurman merely compounded the problem; together they had all the chemistry of house bricks). The Thin Man movies are hardly great art and remaking them wouldn't be the end of the world or anything, but the originals had that same sort of je ne sais quoi (IMO, anywayI think the idea of someone being "irreplaceable" is silly. Nora was created by Dashiell Hammett, whose characters have been interpreted numerous times by different actors (and, in the case of the Thin Man movies, radically revised into a comedy). The great roles in the theatre have been played by thousands of different people.). When the originals are that good and have that something extra going for them, a remake is on a hiding to nothing before it even starts.
Eh, to each their own.![]()
And that might be the key to remaking the Thin Man. Not trying to recreate Powell and Loy, but bringing together a couple with a great chemistry and see what happens.
Then again, I'm sure people would have said the same thing about Sean Connery as Bond, or Bela Lugosi as Dracula, or Douglas Fairbanks as Zorro, or Jack Nicholson as the Joker, or William Shatner as Kirk . . . .
I figured someone would say something like this, and fair enough, too - in general, I agree.I think the idea of someone being "irreplaceable" is silly. Nora was created by Dashiell Hammett, whose characters have been interpreted numerous times by different actors (and, in the case of the Thin Man movies, radically revised into a comedy). The great roles in the theatre have been played by thousands of different people.
In that regard, Depp's casting has an advantage: he's not the kind of actor who'd just imitate the last guy to play the part. He'd have his own interpretation. His take on Willy Wonka owed very little to Gene Wilder (it also...wasn't very good, but that's another question entirely).
Depp's a better fit for the part than Clooney, especially if they keep the boozy aspect.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.