• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Johnny Depp as Nick Charles, The Thin Man?

[yt]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PG3NZjRv2nM&feature=related[/yt]

William Powell & Myrna Loy...they just don't make 'em like this anymore.
 
Do you have a clip of William Powell saying "Why, Mrs. Charles!" with canted eyebrows? That may be my favorite moment in the whole series. :)
 
^ I will look at some more clips and see if I can find that. My favorite line is in that clip I posted: "He didn't get anywhere near my tabloids!" :lol:

I also like that line when Nora is shaking martinis and insists that "These are cocktails, aren't they? And that is Mr. Charles, isn't it? They'll get together!" :lol:

Great stuff!
 
[yt]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1tnbPBCtnI&feature=related[/yt]

Haven't found your line yet, Captain Dago...but this video is really cute. Some great lines.
 
Little trivial Dean Stockwell(of Quantum Leap and Battlestar Galactica fame..)played the son Nick Jr. in the 6th film Song Of the Thin Man.
 
I love the Thin Man series. And I like Johnny Depp as an actor, but geez I really hope this doesn't happen.
 
Then again, I'm sure people would have said the same thing about Sean Connery as Bond, or Bela Lugosi as Dracula, or Douglas Fairbanks as Zorro, or Jack Nicholson as the Joker, or William Shatner as Kirk . . . .

I think the idea of someone being "irreplaceable" is silly. Nora was created by Dashiell Hammett, whose characters have been interpreted numerous times by different actors (and, in the case of the Thin Man movies, radically revised into a comedy). The great roles in the theatre have been played by thousands of different people.
I figured someone would say something like this, and fair enough, too - in general, I agree. However, there are always exceptions, and IMHO The Thin Man is one of them. That godawful excuse for an Avengers movie demonstrated quite clearly that, among other things, chemistry and the various nuances particular actors bring to a role cannot be faked or manufactured (casting someone as completely devoid of charisma as Ralph Feinnes and as utterly talentless as Uma Thurman merely compounded the problem; together they had all the chemistry of house bricks). The Thin Man movies are hardly great art and remaking them wouldn't be the end of the world or anything, but the originals had that same sort of je ne sais quoi (IMO, anyway ;)). When the originals are that good and have that something extra going for them, a remake is on a hiding to nothing before it even starts.

Eh, to each their own. :D
 
Then again, I'm sure people would have said the same thing about Sean Connery as Bond, or Bela Lugosi as Dracula, or Douglas Fairbanks as Zorro, or Jack Nicholson as the Joker, or William Shatner as Kirk . . . .

I think the idea of someone being "irreplaceable" is silly. Nora was created by Dashiell Hammett, whose characters have been interpreted numerous times by different actors (and, in the case of the Thin Man movies, radically revised into a comedy). The great roles in the theatre have been played by thousands of different people.
I figured someone would say something like this, and fair enough, too - in general, I agree. However, there are always exceptions, and IMHO The Thin Man is one of them. That godawful excuse for an Avengers movie demonstrated quite clearly that, among other things, chemistry and the various nuances particular actors bring to a role cannot be faked or manufactured (casting someone as completely devoid of charisma as Ralph Feinnes and as utterly talentless as Uma Thurman merely compounded the problem; together they had all the chemistry of house bricks). The Thin Man movies are hardly great art and remaking them wouldn't be the end of the world or anything, but the originals had that same sort of je ne sais quoi (IMO, anyway ;)). When the originals are that good and have that something extra going for them, a remake is on a hiding to nothing before it even starts.

Eh, to each their own. :D

I think though, the key might be to not RECREATE the same thing, but to make it your own. The Avengers had SOOO many problems that not all of them were Ralph and Uma's fault.

What worked, for me, with Pine as Kirk, he made it his own while not contradicting what happened before, ie, he didn't do a grim and gritty Kirk.

And that might be the key to remaking the Thin Man. Not trying to recreate Powell and Loy, but bringing together a couple with a great chemistry and see what happens.
 
In that regard, Depp's casting has an advantage: he's not the kind of actor who'd just imitate the last guy to play the part. He'd have his own interpretation. His take on Willy Wonka owed very little to Gene Wilder (it also...wasn't very good, but that's another question entirely).
 
Then again, I'm sure people would have said the same thing about Sean Connery as Bond, or Bela Lugosi as Dracula, or Douglas Fairbanks as Zorro, or Jack Nicholson as the Joker, or William Shatner as Kirk . . . .

I think the idea of someone being "irreplaceable" is silly. Nora was created by Dashiell Hammett, whose characters have been interpreted numerous times by different actors (and, in the case of the Thin Man movies, radically revised into a comedy). The great roles in the theatre have been played by thousands of different people.
I figured someone would say something like this, and fair enough, too - in general, I agree.


Oh, one I forgot before: I'm sure the world was full of people that thought nobody could ever replace John Wayne as Rooster Cogburn . . . .

I agree, btw, that the gawdawful AVENGERS movie failed in part because Fiennes and Uma completely failed to capture the breezy chemistry of the original actors, and that Diana Rigg as Emma Peel is a really tough act to follow.

But does that mean that another actress, in another movie, couldn't blow us as away as Emma? Maybe. We'll never know unless somebody tries . . . .
 
Most attempts to recreate, recast or re-imagine classics fail miserably. Not always because of the actors-- the cast was the only thing good about nuTrek, even though they weren't playing the original characters-- but it's very difficult to replace someone whose own individual personality and style was integral to the creation of an icon. Nevertheless, Depp is quite a chameleon, so I'm a bit more optimistic about this than I normally would be.
 
In that regard, Depp's casting has an advantage: he's not the kind of actor who'd just imitate the last guy to play the part. He'd have his own interpretation. His take on Willy Wonka owed very little to Gene Wilder (it also...wasn't very good, but that's another question entirely).

Okay here's my problem with Depp. He really isn't the chameleon people make him out to be. He basically has two modes:

1. Priggish Weirdo. Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, Sleepy Hollow.

2. Wild-Eyed Maniac. PotC, Sweeny Todd, Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas.

Occasionally he falls in between 1 and 2, with a weirdo/maniac hybrid, such as with Ed Wood. He used to have 3. Tragic Naif (Edward Scissorshands, Dead Man) but he seems to have dropped that role. Maybe he's gotten too old.

Nick Charles doesn't slot into any of those modes, and can't be shoehorned in without destroying the character. Conversely, I don't mind the idea of Depp playing Tonto because I'm curious to see whether it will be Priggish Weirdo Tonto or Wild-Eyed Maniac Tonto (either could be fun). Barnabas Collins, as a vampire, is uniquely positioned to combine all three modes - a priggish maniac with a whiff of tragedy.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top