That's not why Disney bought Lucasfilm, if Disney wants an original adventure film, they'll just make one and release it themselves.
Prince of Persia,
John Carter,
Alice 2,
Tomorrowland,
The Lone Ranger,
The Nutcracker and the Four Kingdoms,
A Wrinkle in Time... Seems to me that, apart from the
Pirates franchise, Disney's adventure film output is in dire need of rescue.
TThe only reason they bought Lucasfilm is for Star Wars, and Indiana Jones and possibly now Willow as a secondary thing, so that is where they are going have them focus.
Obviously; I'm just saying I'd have more respect for Kennedy as a producer/studio boss if she were doing anything more than mere
Star Wars franchise maintenance. Disney didn't buy Marvel for virtually unknown characters like the GotG or Carol Danvers, but Marvel Studios under Kevin Feige made them huge hits anyhow.
Despite what some people like to believe, her time as CEO of Lucasfilm has been an incredible success, and the only way I could see her not continuing in the position is if she moves up in the company.
Yes, three of the four movies she's overseen made a lot of money, but
TLJ made 65% of
TFA, Solo made 39% of
Rogue One, and now the studio won't be releasing a new movie for three whole years. Moreover, given that Abrams basically spent two whole
Trek movies auditioning/practicing for
TFA, making his hiring the most obvious choice in the world (after Spielberg said no), I don't give her enormous credit for that selection. Ergo, IMHO, it's fair to call her management of Lucasfilm thus far a mixed bag, given the enormous advantages (decades-long OT franchise nostalgia, returning actors, 10 years without a major
SW movie) she inherited.