Lens flares are the reason why Tiny Tim needs crutches...
Abrams is a Star Wars fan, not a Star Trek fan.
Which means absolutely zero. Nick Meyer wasn't a Star Trek fan and Stuart Baird/John Logan were. Guess who made the better movie?
Yeah, sometimes what a franchise needs is a new perspective, and fans tend to be more concerned with looking back than looking forward.The notion that "fans make the best films" is regularly contradicted by actual fan films.
Abrams is a Star Wars fan, not a Star Trek fan.
Which means absolutely zero. Nick Meyer wasn't a Star Trek fan and Stuart Baird/John Logan were. Guess who made the better movie?
Heck, Nicholas Meyer directed and/or scripted three of the best STAR TREK movies, despite not being a lifelong fan.
This is a public discussion forum. We have just as much right to refute the OP's ridiculous assertion as you do to defend it TREK_GOD_1. People don't own a thread just because they start it and there is no requirement for posters to agree with the OP.
http://www.trekbbs.com/faq.php?faq=vb_faq#faq_flamesFlames.
Obviously, you cannot insult other people. You may disagree with someone's opinion, but you may not attack the person themselves for posting that opinion.
No, he wrote "The Bonding" which is how he got his foot in the door. "The Defector" came after that.Perhaps the best thing to happen to Trek, as far as a fan-in-the-production was concerned was Ronald D. Moore....wrote "The Defector" and sold it to TNG.
By many accounts Baird was not. Logan was.Which means absolutely zero. Nick Meyer wasn't a Star Trek fan and Stuart Baird/John Logan were...
This is a public discussion forum. We have just as much right to refute the OP's ridiculous assertion as you do to defend it TREK_GOD_1. People don't own a thread just because they start it and there is no requirement for posters to agree with the OP.
You invalidate your own protest, as you conveniently ignore the personal attacks, disgusting photos, etc., all aimed a fellow member..all because he does not like the deservedly questioned JJ Abrams.
You are defending being childish and vile, which robs you of any high ground.
..and for the members who spent pages claiming a forum allows this kind of behavior, guess again:
http://www.trekbbs.com/faq.php?faq=vb_faq#faq_flamesFlames.
Obviously, you cannot insult other people. You may disagree with someone's opinion, but you may not attack the person themselves for posting that opinion.
This is far beyond disagreeing, but pages of personal attacks, and the rules do not support that, or offensive photos.
This is a public discussion forum. We have just as much right to refute the OP's ridiculous assertion as you do to defend it TREK_GOD_1. People don't own a thread just because they start it and there is no requirement for posters to agree with the OP.
You invalidate your own protest, as you conveniently ignore the personal attacks, disgusting photos, etc., all aimed a fellow member..all because he does not like the deservedly questioned JJ Abrams.
You are defending being childish and vile, which robs you of any high ground.
..and for the members who spent pages claiming a forum allows this kind of behavior, guess again:
http://www.trekbbs.com/faq.php?faq=vb_faq#faq_flamesFlames.
Obviously, you cannot insult other people. You may disagree with someone's opinion, but you may not attack the person themselves for posting that opinion.
This is far beyond disagreeing, but pages of personal attacks, and the rules do not support that, or offensive photos.
By many accounts Baird was not. Logan was.
You don't see the same kind of series-saving praise given to Abrams' involvement in ST.
Which means absolutely zero. Nick Meyer wasn't a Star Trek fan and Stuart Baird/John Logan were. Guess who made the better movie?
Heck, Nicholas Meyer directed and/or scripted three of the best STAR TREK movies, despite not being a lifelong fan.
Buy Meyer was so on-target in understanding what ST required. That is almost as important as going into a production as a fan. He brought out the best of what the actors and general feel of ST had established in TOS and made it work--beautifully--on the big screen. But that took understanding. You don't see the same kind of series-saving praise given to Abrams' involvement in ST.
I thought the complaint was JJ messed up Star Trek by making it look too much like Star Wars. So, what's he done here?
The notion that "fans make the best films" is regularly contradicted by actual fan films.
The last thing Trek needs is to be run by fans.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.