• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Jelico

Unicron said:Jellico also seemed unwilling to actually ask Riker and the other senior officers how to modify the shifts; he just changed them and expected the crew to automatically agree.

No captain asks, a captain commands, it's rather the essence of being "in command (of a ship)". Jellico didn't care if they agreed, as long as they follow the orders he gave them - the way any captain expects his orders followed. Jellico didn't need to ask "how" they modified the shifts, he couldn't care less "how" they modified them, as long as they did it, they could choose to do it however it best suited them, as long as it was done within the time he wanted it done.

To be fair, I do consider Jellico a capable captain. I believe he could have been written better. The thing that bothers me most about some of his scenes is not his tendency to be an asshole, but the fact that he seemed to be basing some of his command decisions on his personal mistrust of the Cardassians. I got the impression he would have been glad to fight another war against the evil Cardies, and a good example of this is how he decided it'd be good diplomacy to piss off the Cardassian captain waiting in the lounge.

You should go rewatch the episode again. His actions were all geared toward coming to a treaty and do so peacefully. And he wasn't an asshole either.
 
Notice, also, that he didn't treat The Machine that way. Data just obeys orders and humans will obey but.............
 
3D Master said:
No captain asks, a captain commands, it's rather the essence of being "in command (of a ship)". Jellico didn't care if they agreed, as long as they follow the orders he gave them - the way any captain expects his orders followed. Jellico didn't need to ask "how" they modified the shifts, he couldn't care less "how" they modified them, as long as they did it, they could choose to do it however it best suited them, as long as it was done within the time he wanted it done.

But any good commander relies on his executives for advice; his authority is fine by itself once the discussion is over and the decisions are made. That's especially true when he is in temporary command of a vessel unfamiliar to him. Any captain who just blindly follows his own judgment is not worth following.

Jellico pretty much ignored any attempts at advice given to him. As he told Picard, he "didn't have time" to listen to Riker or anyone else. For that matter, he also seemed to fully expect Picard's team to fail and either get captured or killed. Those are not the actions of someone who actually gives a damn about the mission, the ship and the crew. Same is true at the negotiations - Jellico thinks it's clever to make the Cardassians think he's being unreasonable just because he doesn't expect them to give up anything easily. Any captain who has actually had to serve as a diplomat knows that's the worst thing you can do to a potential adversary - especially when you might annoy them enough to start a war with you.

In fairness though, I haven't seen the ep in awhile so I will try to watch again the next time it's on.
 
CaptainStoner said:
I think essentially what this boils down to is the difference in views of what Star Trek ought to be. Too many people want to turn it into Star Wars or Space Invaders. They forget that in Trek, there has been no INTERNAL Earth wars for a long time, no poverty, and the violent undertones of the major religions have been put in museums where they belong.

Yes, but there has been a history of almost constant conflict with non-Earth/non-Federation neighbors. And on top of that, we don't know how recently most other Federation Members (who are, after all, just as important in the UFP as Earth) have been without civil strife; hell, we know for a fact that Vulcan was undergoing a miniature civil war as recently as 6 years before the Federation was founded.

So the fact that many of Earth's social ills have been solved and that Earth has been at peace with itself does not mean that the military, and the concommitant responsibilities of membership in the military, has disappeared.

The crew of the Enterprise were not trained to be "good soldiers".

Yes, they were. Kirk refers to himself as a soldier in "Errand of Mercy;" Nog refers to Starfleet officers as soldiers in "Valiant." They're also explorers, and also scientists, and also diplomats -- but they're also soldiers, for it is they who defend the Federation from aggression.
 
Jellico was a jerk, but worked well in the story. I wouldn't like him personally, probably, but got the job done. He wasn't Picard, and that was the point. Jellico is great in the Peter David New Frontiers novels as well.
 
If people under Picard didn't obey his orders... How would he be any different than Jellico? Turning the Table remember how Troi and Riker crushed Picards dreams of being something "greater" in Tapestry?
 
Trekker4747 said:
not_this_shit_again.jpg

x2

I am tired of all of the blubbering, whining vaginas griping about Jellico. I was in the military and would have proudly served under Jellico in battle.
 
I had a CO like Jellico when I was in the Navy. He was a man that was sharp, expected excellence of those under him, and was also fair in his treatment of everyone (including the screw-ups).

In order to put this post in the proper context I have to admit being one of the screw-ups. I took a small unauthorized vacation and had to go to Captain's Mast. I took my 30 days restriction, 30 days of extra duty, reduction in rank, and forfieture of 1/2 month's pay times 2. My Captain, Captain Waickwicz, continued to treat me with courtesy and respect after my punishments were served.

These are the traits I saw in Captain Jellico. I do not believe he placed unreasonable burdens upon the ENTs crew. I even recall Picard giving him the respect he deserved both before and after the mission into Cardassian territory.

I do not understand why people are giving Jellico so much grief, we only saw him in one 2 parter after all.

My suggestion is for all of his detactors to watch the episodes again, this time with more of an analytical eye. Look at his actions as a COMMANDING officer.
 
Unicron said:
But any good commander relies on his executives for advice; his authority is fine by itself once the discussion is over and the decisions are made. That's especially true when he is in temporary command of a vessel unfamiliar to him. Any captain who just blindly follows his own judgment is not worth following.

That's crap. A good commander relies on his executives for advice - WHEN HE NEEDS IT. When he doesn't need it, he gives a command and it is to be followed, plain and simple. And it's not unfamiliar to him - it's Starfleet vessel, the crew is to follow his commands. And I'm the one who would be scared to hell to follow any captain who has no own judgment, he is not worth following.

Jellico pretty much ignored any attempts at advice given to him.

He didn't have any advice given to him, only objections and attempts at making him a Picard clone.

As he told Picard, he "didn't have time" to listen to Riker or anyone else.

And he was right.

For that matter, he also seemed to fully expect Picard's team to fail and either get captured or killed.

And he was right - and anyone who had an inkling of what they were doing, would be expecting the exact same thing. It was all but a suicide mission.

Those are not the actions of someone who actually gives a damn about the mission, the ship and the crew.

Wrong, those are EXACTLY the actions of someone who cares deeply about the mission, the ship, and the crew.

Same is true at the negotiations - Jellico thinks it's clever to make the Cardassians think he's being unreasonable just because he doesn't expect them to give up anything easily.

And he's right - he has experience with Cardassians, he understands how they think - and he does what needs to be done to get the mission you say he doesn't care about to the best possible conclusion.

Any captain who has actually had to serve as a diplomat knows that's the worst thing you can do to a potential adversary - especially when you might annoy them enough to start a war with you.

Human adversaries of our culture - not Cardassian ones with a totally alien culture and genetically ingrained reactions.
 
3D Master said:
That's crap. A good commander relies on his executives for advice - WHEN HE NEEDS IT. When he doesn't need it, he gives a command and it is to be followed, plain and simple. And it's not unfamiliar to him - it's Starfleet vessel, the crew is to follow his commands. And I'm the one who would be scared to hell to follow any captain who has no own judgment, he is not worth following.

Yeah, and any experienced commander may find himself needing advice frequently. That's why the executives are there, because individual experience is not enough. And Jellico did not command a Galaxy class starship, which means the Enterprise was not as familiar to him. It's kind of like giving the captain of a destroyer temporary command of a battleship or carrier, and watching that captain pretend he can run the ship exactly the same way.

For what it's worth, I do agree with some of Jellico's decisions. I think he was probably right to a degree when Riker argued with him about rescuing Picard, because the treaty Riker mentions only applies to POWs. If Jellico agreed, he'd be tacitly admitting that the Feds are now at war.

And he was right.

No, he was making an excuse because Jellico has the need to control his crew. It's how he deals with his personal doubts as a commander. He also was unwilling on a personal level to believe that the Cardassians cared about the peace too, and I think that influenced his judgment.

And he was right - and anyone who had an inkling of what they were doing, would be expecting the exact same thing. It was all but a suicide mission.

He should still hope for the best, even when victory is unlikely. As it stands, his attitude was "Picard, you're screwed. Therefore, the ship is mine and anyone who disagrees (Riker) can fuck off." Frankly, as a captain who had to turn over command the way Picard did for mission purposes, I'd be a little concerned if my replacement told me he wouldn't care if I didn't make it.



And he's right - he has experience with Cardassians, he understands how they think - and he does what needs to be done to get the mission you say he doesn't care about to the best possible conclusion.

He understands how some Cardassians think. They do not all think alike, but Jellico assumes they do because they're an old enemy. If the guy had been in command at the end of "The Defector" he probably would have fought Tomalak to "protect" the honor of the Federation, rather than letting the stalemate keep the peace.

Human adversaries of our culture - not Cardassian ones with a totally alien culture and genetically ingrained reactions.

The principles remain the same. Pissing off the other guy just because you personally don't trust him (which is what Jellico did) is bad.

Sec31Mike said:

These are the traits I saw in Captain Jellico. I do not believe he placed unreasonable burdens upon the ENTs crew. I even recall Picard giving him the respect he deserved both before and after the mission into Cardassian territory.

Yeah, he only increased the shifts in all departments, while reassigning a third of the engineering staff to security over Geordi's objections. Both he and Riker agreed that Jellico was unwilling to listen to them or any of the department heads. Picard did show him a lot of respect, far more than I might have considering Jellico made it clear it wouldn't bother him if Picard failed.

I do not understand why people are giving Jellico so much grief, we only saw him in one 2 parter after all.

That's a fair point, and I agree we didn't get a great context for Jellico because of the nature of the story and how the character was written. I wouldn't mind seeing him a bit more to get a better understanding of the character.

But I will say that I was not impressed with him when the ep first aired, and even though I've rewatched it many times and tried to see if I missed some things, I still have a lot of the same complaints.
 
Sci said:
Yes, they were. Kirk refers to himself as a soldier in "Errand of Mercy;" Nog refers to Starfleet officers as soldiers in "Valiant." They're also explorers, and also scientists, and also diplomats -- but they're also soldiers, for it is they who defend the Federation from aggression.

Just want to add in Homefront/Paradise Lost Starfleet Officers are referred to as military personnel SEVERAL times in the episode. This includes when Sisko informs the President that Leyton is planning a military coup of the government to rework the Federation into a military dictatorship.
 
I'll bet Sisko could have performed this mission like Jelico and not have everyone and their brother hate him.
One caveat, Jelico did have pix his kid had drawn on the wall-I guess they were trying to show a little less brutal side.
 
Unicron said:
3D Master said:
That's crap. A good commander relies on his executives for advice - WHEN HE NEEDS IT. When he doesn't need it, he gives a command and it is to be followed, plain and simple. And it's not unfamiliar to him - it's Starfleet vessel, the crew is to follow his commands. And I'm the one who would be scared to hell to follow any captain who has no own judgment, he is not worth following.

Yeah, and any experienced commander may find himself needing advice frequently. That's why the executives are there, because individual experience is not enough.

In Jellico's case, it was.

And Jellico did not command a Galaxy class starship, which means the Enterprise was not as familiar to him. It's kind of like giving the captain of a destroyer temporary command of a battleship or carrier, and watching that captain pretend he can run the ship exactly the same way.

Wrong. The only difference between Jellico's old ship and the Enterprise, is that the latter is bigger. It's NOTHING like a battleship and a carrier. They're both battle shps.

For what it's worth, I do agree with some of Jellico's decisions. I think he was probably right to a degree when Riker argued with him about rescuing Picard, because the treaty Riker mentions only applies to POWs. If Jellico agreed, he'd be tacitly admitting that the Feds are now at war.

He was right all the time.

And he was right.

No, he was making an excuse because Jellico has the need to control his crew. It's how he deals with his personal doubts as a commander. He also was unwilling on a personal level to believe that the Cardassians cared about the peace too, and I think that influenced his judgment.

MOTHER OF GOD!

The Cardassians were thought to have developed or were developing a biogenic weapon. They hid a fleet ready to invade the Federation in a nebula. They lured the captain of the Federation flagship into a trap. And in a earlier episode the Federation already found out that the Cardassians were gearing up for war; and Jellico will have had briefings on this. HE WAS RIGHT!

Jellico does not need to control his crew, and didn't need to. They were under his control/command by the sheer virtue of him BEING THE CAPTAIN OF THE ENTERPRISE! Whatever he did with Cardassians, also has no impact on the crew.

Finally, we've seen Picard himself state that no matter how many doubts and insecurities he has, to the crew he must look like he's absolutely certain. So, according to you, Picard must be just as bad a captain and just as big a jerk as Jellico!

Sjeez.

And he was right - and anyone who had an inkling of what they were doing, would be expecting the exact same thing. It was all but a suicide mission.

He should still hope for the best, even when victory is unlikely. As it stands, his attitude was "Picard, you're screwed. Therefore, the ship is mine and anyone who disagrees (Riker) can fuck off." Frankly, as a captain who had to turn over command the way Picard did for mission purposes, I'd be a little concerned if my replacement told me he wouldn't care if I didn't make it.

:rolleyes:

HE DID HOPE FOR THE BEST!! And he NEVER said anything about hoping Picard didn't return. If he wanted Picard to fail so badly, he would never have helped Picard out with that probe - something Necheyeva never bothered to do herself.

Also he NEVER wanted anyone to fuck off. He needed everyone to follow his orders, because in order to lead that ship properly, he couldn't do things half-way, he need to be the captain of that ship, period.


And he's right - he has experience with Cardassians, he understands how they think - and he does what needs to be done to get the mission you say he doesn't care about to the best possible conclusion.

He understands how some Cardassians think. They do not all think alike, but Jellico assumes they do because they're an old enemy. If the guy had been in command at the end of "The Defector" he probably would have fought Tomalak to "protect" the honor of the Federation, rather than letting the stalemate keep the peace.

:role eyes: Sorry, but let's see: Cardassians build up to war in an earlier episode, and now are building a biogenic weapon. Wow! What a shocker! The Cardassians might not be fully upfront. And Jellico's negotiations were all to make a truly lasting peace, and not some quick stop gap the Cardassians would only use to build up further.

He was right, plain and simple. And this has nothing to do with the Romulans or how they are.

Human adversaries of our culture - not Cardassian ones with a totally alien culture and genetically ingrained reactions.

The principles remain the same. Pissing off the other guy just because you personally don't trust him (which is what Jellico did) is bad.

BULLSHIT! He didn't piss the Cardassians off because he didn't trust them. The same way saying sorry to that one Federation species would get you into a fight, and essentially telling him to go fuck off, would have earned you his respect - different cultures and species react different to the way you do things. You want to get something out of a Klingon, you aren't nice, you yell in his face. Treating the Cardassians the way Jellico treated them, is the same way.

Yeah, he only increased the shifts in all departments, while reassigning a third of the engineering staff to security over Geordi's objections. Both he and Riker agreed that Jellico was unwilling to listen to them or any of the department heads.

He doesn't need to listen them, they are to follow orders.
 
IIRC, the comment was made that they normally don't do the change of command ceremony if it is intended to be temporary. As far as Jellico, and everyone else knew, it was permanent. It was probably only when Picard got freed (with Jellico's help, as I recall) that Starfleet gave him back the Enterprise. Most likely Picard had enough clout that he could manage it.
 
Well remember in the episode it's clearly said that even Picard doesn't think he'll be coming back from this mission.

Jellico even says to him at one point "The Enterprise is my ship now."
 
3D Master said:
Unicron said:
3D Master said:
That's crap. A good commander relies on his executives for advice - WHEN HE NEEDS IT. When he doesn't need it, he gives a command and it is to be followed, plain and simple. And it's not unfamiliar to him - it's Starfleet vessel, the crew is to follow his commands. And I'm the one who would be scared to hell to follow any captain who has no own judgment, he is not worth following.

Yeah, and any experienced commander may find himself needing advice frequently. That's why the executives are there, because individual experience is not enough.

In Jellico's case, it was.

And Jellico did not command a Galaxy class starship, which means the Enterprise was not as familiar to him. It's kind of like giving the captain of a destroyer temporary command of a battleship or carrier, and watching that captain pretend he can run the ship exactly the same way.

Wrong. The only difference between Jellico's old ship and the Enterprise, is that the latter is bigger. It's NOTHING like a battleship and a carrier. They're both battle ships.

Actually, there is a BIG difference between commanding a carrier and command of a smaller style ship. Carrier Captains are required to have the following experience:
1) Served as a pilot, RIO (Radar-Intercept-Officer), etc
2) Served as the Commanding Officer of a supply replenishment ship (AO, AFS, AOE, etc).

Submarine commanders, as is evident, are ONLY tapped from the submarine community.

Facts aside, Captain Jellico was more than qualified to assume command of the Enterprise.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top