I don't care how many people liked it, it still sucked.
I don't care how many people liked it, it still sucked.
I know laser weapons are a cliche and sci-fi, but something different than porokectile weapons would've been nice to see in this 22nd century set movie.
I know laser weapons are a cliche and sci-fi, but something different than porokectile weapons would've been nice to see in this 22nd century set movie.
Firearms in some form have been in use upwards of 900 years now, and I doubt the next 150 is going to change that completely. Energy weapons will be more widespread on the battlefield certainly, but I still think the standard weapon carried by the soldier on the ground will be a firearm - albeit a much more advanced one than we use today.
Did...did we see the same movie?![]()
I know laser weapons are a cliche and sci-fi, but something different than porokectile weapons would've been nice to see in this 22nd century set movie.
The Pandorapedia and other sources (like the Human Hardware video featurette) make it clear that the intense magnetic fields on Pandora make it necessary to use relatively low-tech weapons and machines.
They are also limited by what the can manufacture on-site. Since the starships only can bring 330 metric tons of cargo per trip, almost all of their machinery is built by generic fabrication facilities using locally mined resources. The Samson and Scorpion gunships are about the maximum level of technology that they can manufacture on-site.
The Samson and Scorpion gunships have long been abandoned on Earth - where much more advanced tech and weapons are available.
Did...did we see the same movie?![]()
Presumably we've both seen Avatar, but I'm not sure that we've both seen environmentalists vs. industry movies. The latter seem to feature a hero (journalist, lawyer, decent hardworking government official) who is confronted with either a wild eyed poor person claiming they or their loved ones were poisoned by pollution, or by a crime committed to cover up the pollution. And the movie basically ends when the proof of the pollution is presented in the proper venue, a court, or the news media, or the proper authorities.
The last one I saw was Silver City, where Chris Cooper snags a dead body killed in the pollution coverup. The one before that I think was I Witness, with pollution in Mexico, which also started with bodies killed to cover up the pollution. And, going back to another movie with mystic Indian stuff, Thunderheart, that wasn't just mystic Indian stuff, it was, wait for it, about a pollution coverup. And it ended with the public exposure of the pollution. No coverup in Avatar, therefore a cliche of environmentalists vs. industry movies left unused.
Are there any cliches about environmentalism vs industry, colonialism and multinational corporations, cowboys vs indians that were not used in this movie?
Of course there are.
Environmentalism vs. industry movies seem like they are always centered around the struggle to reveal the dastardly effects of industrial contamination, none of which is a part of Avatar.
Did...did we see the same movie?
I didn't have a problem with the moral of the movie. Just the heavy-handed, uninteresting storytelling. All that was missing was a shot of the chief with a tear rolling down his cheek as he looks at trash left behind by RDA Corp.
My other biggest problem is the...lack of any acting. There was absolutely no acting in this movie.
My other biggest problem is the...lack of any acting. There was absolutely no acting in this movie.
So it was a documentary on 10 foot tall blue aliens and the men who love them?
[URL="http://www.deadline.com/hollywood/new-years-day-another-big-avatar-payday-the-blind-side-crosses-200m-domestic/"]CAMERON'S BILLION DOLLAR BABY! 'Avatar' [/URL]
[URL="http://www.deadline.com/hollywood/new-years-day-another-big-avatar-payday-the-blind-side-crosses-200m-domestic/"]Passes $1B Worldwide And $350M Domestic After Only [/URL]
[URL="http://www.deadline.com/hollywood/new-years-day-another-big-avatar-payday-the-blind-side-crosses-200m-domestic/"]17 Days In Release[/URL]
By [URL="http://www.deadline.com/hollywood/"]Nikki Finke[/URL] | Category: [URL="http://www.deadline.com/category/uncategorized"]Uncategorized[/URL] |
Saturday January 2, 2010 @ 10:15pm
SATURDAY PM/SUNDAY AM UPDATE: My sources say
early numbers show Avatar's projected North
American cume, after only 17 days in release from
20th Century Fox, will be $350.5 million. And its
worldwide box office figure should be $1.05 billion
coming out of this weekend. Yikes! Then again,
James Cameron's big budget technopic was helped
by higher 3D ticket prices. As a Fox exec just
gushed to me: "Mr. Cameron was king of the
world but now has dominion over the universe.
And he will own the top two slots on the worldwide
all-time box office list!"
My other biggest problem is the...lack of any acting. There was absolutely no acting in this movie.
So it was a documentary on 10 foot tall blue aliens and the men who love them?
Don't feed the troll, Locotus.![]()
Thespeckledkiwi has a history of making absurd points in this thread.(such as no story, no conflict, no drama, and now no acting) He's just bored again.
Don't feed the troll, Locotus.![]()
Thespeckledkiwi has a history of making absurd points in this thread.(such as no story, no conflict, no drama, and now no acting) He's just bored again.
Another movie that comes to mind that fits that trope would be the Travolta vehicle A Civic Action. Since my parents, both environmental engineers, found it laughable, I haven't bothered to return to it, but my vague memories of the plot fit the formula you've outlined.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.