Of course she'd seem full of herself, monotone and sure of just about everything.... she did live like, how many lives?
Why would living several lives maker her monotone? But as far as being sure of herself, one can be sure of themselves without having to remind you why they are. If she's sure of herself, then that's fine. But she's like sure of herself because....she's Dax. And she's eager to remind you of that fact as well.
During the series, she did solve many key problems, thought of many important solutions, was involved in many key stories and characters, and some episodes did involve around some moral issues and decision making geared towards her, much like other characters in the show.
Soooo? I mean, the writers occasionally wrote a Dax episode just like they would do a Kira episode, a Sisko episode, an Odo episode, and so on. Like are you justifying her character somehow by saying, well she DID solve all these things and was involved in key stories....Seriously, so what? It's like with this you're arguing that she was a main character. But we're not debating that. We're debating how insufferable she is.
If anything, she's like Kirk to TOS, Riker to TNG and Paris to Voy..... AKA: The good looking, charming, sexually active, smart ass...... every series needed one, and she was it for DS9.
And she executed it rather poorly. And how was Riker typically a smart ass? He was smug, but he wasn't a smart ass. Ooh, remember in the DS9 episode The Ship? When the Jem'Hadar are shelling the surrounding area trying to draw out the crew of the crashed ship? And Worf, O'Brien and Sisko were arguing and Dax was like, "That's men for you. They buckle under just a little pressure." And Sisko was like, "Dax, maybe you haven't noticed...but no one's laughing." Unfortunately DS9 wasn't willing enough to take risks by having Sisko punctuate his remark with a sharp slap across her stupid face. Now THAT would've been priceless television.
Also, her character and development seemed geared to put the viewer in a conflict. The viewer after a while gets used to certain characters being a certain way. While Jadzia had a few episodes revolving around her questioning her worthiness of being a host and being drummed out of the qualifications, she was a confident, spirited individual that knew how to get along with just about everybody...... then comes Ezri who's completely unsure of herself, more then Jadzia ever was, doesn't know her role, doesn't know her place, and has no clue how to make friends and fill the shoes of Jadzia, meanwhile dealing with Jadzia's friends trying to adapt to Ezri being around now.
So after being annoyed for several seasons with Jadzia's self-consciousness, we now have to endure a couple more of Ezri's? And this...was a good thing according to you?
I think considering the shift DS9 took from season one through to season seven, Jadzia's place in the story line did begin to shift out of perspective, as things shifted from discovery and science, to war and what it does to people..... thus Ezri came into the spotlight and helping people deal with their issues during the war with the Dominion, helped expand the storyline a bit more solidly then if Jadzia remained.
What? You think Jadzia was intentionally killed off just to introduce a character who was a therapist to help people talk about their feelings in a time of war? Like, you say THUS Ezri came into the spotlight...
Imagine if it really went down this way. "Okay guys, we're so knee deep in war stuff, we need to kill Jadzia Dax because the show isn't as sciency anymore. But what possible new job could we bring in a new character to fulfill?"
Farrell left the show suddenly of her own volition. She wasn't like gradually being written out of the show.
Bashir had way more of an ego and a worse set of sexual ethics than Jadzia did. Who cares if Jadzia was "stringing him along?" Julian, being the self-obsessed "charmer" and obvious womanizer (or at least wannabe) that he is, was naive enough to saddle up and go along for years on a ride that never happened. No one was forcing him to, and Jadzia made it clear far more often than not that nothing was going to happen besides idle flirting and some cheap pursuit on his part. Bashir does not deserve the victim card here whatsoever.
Are you crapping down my mouth? First of all, no one is saying Bashir is a victim here. The thing is, yes, Bashir did have an ego. But he was still incredibly naive. And Bashir only was coming on to all these women. I don't think he actually got his pole greased by a single one. And how can you ask who cares if she was stringing him along if a few sentences later you say she made it clear far more often that nothing was going to happen? And it's not like Bashir ever acted all hurt by her rejections. He continued to flirt with her, so sure, it was his own fault, but she loved it when he flirted with her. That's the kind of boost to ego that Jadzia needs. Bashir likes it when people compliment him for curing a horrible plague that kills people. Jadzia likes it when people compliment her for having a parasite inside her.
He came onto Jadzia way too strong
How so? And each time he supposedly did, I didn't see her giving him the cold rejection. Instead she was all, "Oh you!"
just like he did with Sarina Douglas, who was disabled and psychologically couldn't handle his advances.
Well you missed the point then. In the end, Bashir realized she wasn't ready for a relationship. He tried, and when it became clear to him it wasn't going to work, he stopped. Why is that not enough for you?
You would think he would learn to stop whipping it out so early whenever some diverse, smart chick entered the picture. As a young man, I was frequently embarrassed by this horndog's "24th century" behavior.
As a young man?? Well excuse Star Trek! It didn't realize it was too racy for someone of your age. Next incarnation it promises something even less sterile than it already is. And of course you think you make your statement more poignant by accusing him of whipping it out. I guess someone who does equate flirting with exposing one's penis would find him to be a horndog. So my apologies to you.
Most importantly, if Jadzia were a male character, would we be complaining about her "sexual exploits," "promiscuity", and presumptiveness/ego?
I actually could care less about her promiscuity or whatever. But yes I'd still be complaining about her ego, but not because she's a woman. Because she's annoying and her Daxness is like a stick that a punch-stained face kid pokes you with. You know the kid I'm talking about. With like the Hi-C stain on his face and it's all over his shirt and shit. And he has a stick that he pokes you with cause he's a little fuckface and his parents are nowhere to be found. Well in this case, the stick is Dax. And Jadzia is like....poke...poke..poke
Methinks not, at least not to the point and detail that this thread has taken it. It is obvious that many men are uncomfortable with women being strong, in control, and able to make them jump through hoops without ever giving them a treat in return.
Waaaa! It's true! You got it all figured out and I can deny it no longer! I hate strong female characters! It threatens my masculinity in such a way that I'm incapable of even acknowledging the good ones that are all but Dax! I need help....waaaaaa
Seriously though, don't equate hating Jadzia to having issues with women. That's just stupid as hell. Some of my favorite Star Trek characters have been women. Wanna see how it's done? Watch Kira, Janeway, or heck, even Kai Winn. That was one righteous bitch!