• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

It's official. The Enterprise is built in...(spoilers)

Am I the only person who really doesn't give a shit? I mean, the soul of Star Trek is not found in whether the Enterprise was built in San Francisco or Iowa or Saint Petersburg.

Except if you mean St. Petersburg, Russia, remember that it's Leningrad (again) in TOS time. ;)

This will be the first on-screen mention of where the TOS Enterprise was built. It contradicts nothing that came before. It only contradicts off screen assumptions and conventions. The whole thing is a tempest in a teapot.

A good example of another convention taken for canon was that Kirk was from Iowa. But it was in TVH before it was finally given onscreen mention and made "official." There's no reason why Kirk couldn't have said, "I'm from New Jersey. I only work in outer space." It would've contradicted nothing that came before it on screen. Same with the construction of the Enterprise.
 
I smell an opportunity for a time traveling Troi cameo .... ;)
Or Chakotay (whose secret tribal name can be translated as: Death to All Your Shuttlecraft.)
:guffaw:
I'm not sure whether that was ever in a fiver or not, but it sounded right. :D

And if you rearrange the letters in his name, you get "oak yacht".

Am I the only person who really doesn't give a shit? I mean, the soul of Star Trek is not found in whether the Enterprise was built in San Francisco or Iowa or Saint Petersburg.

Except if you mean St. Petersburg, Russia, remember that it's Leningrad (again) in TOS time. ;)
The Enterprise was built by that same little old lady who inwented so many other things? There is order in the Universe, after all. :)
 
This will be the first on-screen mention of where the TOS Enterprise was built. It contradicts nothing that came before. It only contradicts off screen assumptions and conventions. The whole thing is a tempest in a teapot.

Except the dedication plaque that was in every single episode. But, other than that, sure... :rolleyes:

It would've contradicted nothing that came before it on screen. Same with the construction of the Enterprise.

TVH was a nod to the fans of Iowa and done to make people happy. Moving the ship's construction to Iowa is a cheap moment of 'drama' for Kirk and is done deliberately ignoring the franchise's history.

Of course, the other thing is that this really is not the same Enterprise that was in TOS. This is an Enterprise built with technology from future Spock in order to save the Federation from Nero's nefarious time-travel plot.

*sighs* I tell ya, these days, it seems like all you have to do to get a Trek movie is take a dump, film it, and slap the words "Star Trek" on it...
 
Last edited:
This will be the first on-screen mention of where the TOS Enterprise was built. It contradicts nothing that came before. It only contradicts off screen assumptions and conventions. The whole thing is a tempest in a teapot.

Except the dedication plaque that was in every single episode. But, other than that, sure... :rolleyes:

It would've contradicted nothing that came before it on screen. Same with the construction of the Enterprise.

TVH was a nod to the fans of Iowa and done to make people happy. Moving the ship's construction to Iowa is a cheap moment of 'drama' for Kirk and is done deliberately ignoring the franchise's history.

I tell ya, these days, it seems like all you have to do to get a Trek movie is take a dump, film it, and slap the words "Star Trek" on it...

The plaque also says "STARSHIP CLASS." So, was making the ship Constitution Class a violation of canon, too? ;)

The plaque only says SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF. It could be because SF is its "home port," where it is registered, because Starfleet is based there, or because the company that built the Enterprise is based there.

Folks are merely extrapolating that it was builf in SF from the plaque and the written word (which is not canon). Beyond that, assuming it was built in SF is no different than assuming SF stands for the things I mentioned above, or Kirk was from Iowa before it was mentioned in TVH.

Oh, and maybe it says SF in reference to THE PLAQUE being built in San Francisco. ;)
 
Last edited:
*sighs* I tell ya, these days, it seems like all you have to do to get a Trek movie is take a dump, film it, and slap the words "Star Trek" on it...

Said about an accomplished group of writers and artists by someone who displays no art here that's more inventive than mere tracing of other people's work.
 
This will be the first on-screen mention of where the TOS Enterprise was built. It contradicts nothing that came before. It only contradicts off screen assumptions and conventions. The whole thing is a tempest in a teapot.

Except the dedication plaque that was in every single episode. But, other than that, sure... :rolleyes:

It would've contradicted nothing that came before it on screen. Same with the construction of the Enterprise.
TVH was a nod to the fans of Iowa and done to make people happy. Moving the ship's construction to Iowa is a cheap moment of 'drama' for Kirk and is done deliberately ignoring the franchise's history.

Of course, the other thing is that this really is not the same Enterprise that was in TOS. This is an Enterprise built with technology from future Spock in order to save the Federation from Nero's nefarious time-travel plot.

*sighs* I tell ya, these days, it seems like all you have to do to get a Trek movie is take a dump, film it, and slap the words "Star Trek" on it...
Or, all you have to do is be a highly successful producer/director to whom the owners went, at their own initiative, for help to revitalize a franchise that, according to a lot of people already (not me, but many others) had had "a dump" taken on it already. See how perspective shapes one's world view?
 
Am I the only person who really doesn't give a shit? I mean, the soul of Star Trek is not found in whether the Enterprise was built in San Francisco or Iowa or Saint Petersburg.

Except if you mean St. Petersburg, Russia, remember that it's Leningrad (again) in TOS time. ;)

Not necessarily. The oblast (province) that St. Petersburg is located in is still called Leningrad oblast. It's entirely possible that Chekov was talking about the oblast, not the city. ;)

This will be the first on-screen mention of where the TOS Enterprise was built. It contradicts nothing that came before. It only contradicts off screen assumptions and conventions. The whole thing is a tempest in a teapot.

Except the dedication plaque that was in every single episode. But, other than that, sure... :rolleyes:

OH NOEZ!!!! THEY POSSIBLY CONTRADICTED A BARELY-VISIBLE AND VAGUELY-WORDED PLAQUE THAT THE CAMERA NEVER LINGERED ON FOR MORE THAN TWO SECONDS AND THAT HAS ALREADY BEEN CONTRADICTED BY PREVIOUS CANONICAL INSTALLMENTS THAT REFER TO THE ENTERPRISE AS "CONSTITUTION-CLASS" RATHER THAN "STARSHIP CLASS!" THOSE BASTARDS! CANON IS DISSOLVING ALL AROUND ME! AAAAAAAGGGGGGGGH!!

Moving the ship's construction to Iowa is a cheap moment of 'drama' for Kirk and is done deliberately ignoring the franchise's history.

No, it's deliberately ignoring a piece of scenic design that only an incredibly anal-retentive, detail-oriented geek would notice. I mean, yeah, I noticed, but I also know enough to tell when my anal-retentive attention to detail doesn't actually matter in producing a good work of art, too.
 
Am I the only person who really doesn't give a shit? I mean, the soul of Star Trek is not found in whether the Enterprise was built in San Francisco or Iowa or Saint Petersburg.

this comment really goes for everything being bitched about this movie. "oh they're not supposed to meet yet," "oh, that wasn't supposed to happen," "it didn't happen like that, boo." it's a timeline changing story so things won't exactly remain the same. if people aren't bothered by ship change, they shouldn't be bothered too much by all the other changes.
 
Look at it in much the same way you view the "MADE IN CHINA" label on products. It almost never says where in China. And the San Francisco Ship Yards area/region of authority over vessel and probe construction could cover entire continents on Earth.
 
In fact, "San" is short for "Sanford."

Sanford Francisco is the name of the chief designer of the Enterprise.

He's a descendant of George and Susan Francisco, who were among the quarter of a million Tenctonese refugees who settled on Earth in the late 20th century.

See, it all fits together within meta-canon.
 
In fact, "San" is short for "Sanford."

Sanford Francisco is the name of the chief designer of the Enterprise.

He's a descendant of George and Susan Francisco, who were among the quarter of a million Tenctonese refugees who settled on Earth in the late 20th century.

See, it all fits together within meta-canon.

Sadly, some fanfic is on that level.:p
 
In fact, "San" is short for "Sanford."

Sanford Francisco is the name of the chief designer of the Enterprise.

He's a descendant of George and Susan Francisco, who were among the quarter of a million Tenctonese refugees who settled on Earth in the late 20th century.

See, it all fits together within meta-canon.

wasn't george's real name"sam"? i think it was james caan's character that gave him the nickname george if im not mistaken.
 
In Star Trek:TOU (The Original Universe), the Enterprise was built in and above the San Francisco Fleet Yards. The characters have the backstories already established.

In Star Trek: TNU (The New Universe), it's built in Iowa. The characters have NEW backstories.

If it's not "fixed universe" (aka they press the "reset button") at the end of the film, then it's a reboot...

It's that simple.

Can we PLEASE stop slagging on each other now?
 
Woah, I like these: ST: TOU & TNU. *steals them*

ST: TOU & TNU. TM @ Uss Stardis, dated 12.12.08 :devil: he-he-he
 
Lets review them.

TOU:
ENT
TOS
TNG
DS9
VOY

TMP
TWOK
TSFS
TVH
TFF
TUC
FC
INS
NEM

TNU:
ST

Not that difficult.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top