One more little kid vote for TOS-R.
That would appear to be the target demographic.
That's not really much of a put down: most of us were little kids when we became trekkies.
One more little kid vote for TOS-R.
That would appear to be the target demographic.
Personally, I was 6. Hence my extreme love of the Original Jeffries' Enterprise.That's not really much of a put down: most of us were little kids when we became trekkies.
It ALL has to do with TOS, just like we ALL have connections to our parents. All is one, and change is the essential process of all existence.but it's a reboot and its own thing and nothing to do with TOS.
JJprise is crap, but it's a reboot and its own thing and nothing to do with TOS.Question for those that care not for the remastered episodes:
Which is worse- CGIing Original Trek, or the JJPrise design?
![]()
How they remade the TOS f/x isn't a complet
e write-off, but it's botched.
I would say, yes and yes.There really are two parts to this whole argument: was there a need to put new effects into the show for Blu-ray, and did they do a good job?
I would say, yes and yes.There really are two parts to this whole argument: was there a need to put new effects into the show for Blu-ray, and did they do a good job?
But that's just me.![]()
That's me on every ep!
I would accept that as an axiom.If you show the TOS-R episodes and TOS episodes to 100 people...98 of them will say TOS-R is better...doesn't matter if they are 6, 12, or 47 years old. Guaranteed.
Whoop-dee-doo.JJprise is crap, but it's a reboot and its own thing and nothing to do with TOS.Question for those that care not for the remastered episodes:
Which is worse- CGIing Original Trek, or the JJPrise design?
![]()
How they remade the TOS f/x isn't a complet
e write-off, but it's botched.
That "crap" got a Writers Guild nomination, Producers Guild of America Award nom, National Board of Review award top 10, Producers Guild of America Awards nomination, Hugo nomination, ST's first Grammy and many others in every phase of production. You may not think its "Star Trek" but its a respected movie in the industry, with crtitics, and yes..most fans.
In fact, it IS an alternate history of TOS, but now the dominant one...TOS is another alternate history.
An extensive list of all the ST09 awards. It'll take awhile to read.
http://memory-alpha.org/wiki/Star_Trek_(film)
One more little kid vote for TOS-R.
That would appear to be the target demographic.
Little kids and young adults have always been the main target group of TOS.That's not really much of a put down: most of us were little kids when we became trekkies.
Do those who object to the remastered versions do so because they don't like the quality of the remastered and think they could have done a better job or do they simply object to TOS being touched at all and feel the original effects are crucial to their enjoyment of it?
Well, I'm a kid at heart & I love the rendering of the Enterprise in TOS-R:Little kids and young adults have always been the main target group of TOS.
Well, I'm a kid at heart & I love the rendering of the Enterprise in TOS-R:Little kids and young adults have always been the main target group of TOS.
![]()
It would be more awesome if my gorram cheap camera could focus closer up!!!Awesome!
The JJverse may be considered the dominant one, but not in my mind, and a few others.
I think the TOS-R intent was well meaning but did not get implemented correctly.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.