I posted this comment elsewhere, but thought it more appropriate here. People seem to be up in arms because the Abrams Enterprise doesn't look exactly like the 1966 Enterprise. They're trying to rationalized how it could be an earlier configuration or some-such, or just dismissing the project out of hand because of the changed design.
I think of it this way, they just recast the part. If we can accept that Kirsty Alley and Robin Curtis are the same person, why is it so tough to accept that the Abrams 1701 and the TOS 1701 are the same ship?
Just a thought.
I think of it this way, they just recast the part. If we can accept that Kirsty Alley and Robin Curtis are the same person, why is it so tough to accept that the Abrams 1701 and the TOS 1701 are the same ship?
Just a thought.