PG-13 didn't exist back them. It went from PG to R.
It's a PG-13 Rating, and Bridge panoramas are online...
- Thread starter Admiral Buzzkill
- Start date
- Status
PG-13 didn't exist back them. It went from PG to R.
you would be hard-pressed to find a pg-13 movie with boobs these days (not just silhouettes). they're mostly R rated
We're such a bunch of prudes.
Titanic comes to mind. Breasts shown in a situation that isn't overtly sexual can usually squeak by in a PG-13 movie, which might explain how Airplane! got a PG back in the day, and how they were shown in the PG-13 The Last Emperor.
Tits!
Oops, wrong context.
Oops, wrong context.
Beast!
You and your CockRock™ need therapy to get in touch with whatever's repressing your naive aesthetic response.
They show tits in 16 Candles and that's a PG flick. I guess John Hughes has some kinda magic tit mojo.
No surprise about the rating what with all the combat, grit and action in this one. Even the final STAR WARS movie jettisoned almost thirty years of PG ratings for a PG-13. And wasn't NEMESIS one of only two PG-13 TREK films up until now?
still hate the bridge. urgh.
Looks like the new helm readouts take the "floating directional gimble" look seen to another extent in ENTERPRISE displays and kick it up several notches.
CaptainHawk1
Commodore
Terrible point, they've gotten way looser.
And WTF does it have to do with the discussion.
CaptainHawk1
Commodore
I agree with you ''Squiggyfm'' But I would say ''PAINFULLY'' antiquated!
It looks how a "future" would look like using design technique from the late 70s.
Ergo, antiquated. Your mileage may vary.I don't want to sound mean, but come on! really? Futuristic? I dont think so!
No accounting for bad taste is there.
Back in the day you didn't get much finer. When I was 11 or 12 your best bet for seeing barely legal boobies was in a Hughes movie.
I really don't see how anyone can even begin to stomach the look of this bridge... it's just so f-ing ridiculous...
At least when nuBSG redid the Galactica's CIC, it was made to look like a real true-to-life military command center. But this thing... ugh. It does not even attempt to honor the original design in even the very slightest way. Rather, it serves to become a technicolor parody of the original, to exaggerate and poke fun at it. This new bridge truly looks like a large version of the toy, it's so damned silly.
Nothing about the design makes any sense, whatsoever, and the decor and colors are horrendous. But, if that's what they want, let them have it.
At least when nuBSG redid the Galactica's CIC, it was made to look like a real true-to-life military command center. But this thing... ugh. It does not even attempt to honor the original design in even the very slightest way. Rather, it serves to become a technicolor parody of the original, to exaggerate and poke fun at it. This new bridge truly looks like a large version of the toy, it's so damned silly.
Nothing about the design makes any sense, whatsoever, and the decor and colors are horrendous. But, if that's what they want, let them have it.
In my opinion, it's still preferable to the Enterprise-E bridge. This might even be the anti-Sovereign bridge.
Sorry, but I just can't take that sentence seriously.
Ummm...yes...it seems the haters have to get together to get their story straight.
Ummm...yes...it seems the haters have to get together to get their story straight.
Nah. The cheerleading squad is so good at mindless groupthink, the "haters" could never hope to compete.
The TrekBBS: where optimism and happiness is equivalent to nonstop negativity and anger.
- Status
