Dial-up's a bitch...
Doubtful. TMP is 30 years old and the bridge of the refit (and the refit herself) don't look antiquated, tacky pr corny, in fact it looks quite futuristic.
It looks how a "future" would look like using design technique from the late 70s.
![]()
Ergo, antiquated. Your mileage may vary.
Exactly. Apple stores look nothing like this set - someone said "Apple store" at some point early on and people have been parroting that ever since - evidently most have never actually seen an Apple store.
The only Starfleet bridge design to incorporate a controversial "giant sucking turbine" ceiling ultimately responsible for the deaths of 34 crewpeople.
As Leonard McCoy put it, "just who in the fuck thought that was a good idea, anyway?!"
The only Starfleet bridge design to incorporate a controversial "giant sucking turbine" ceiling ultimately responsible for the deaths of 34 crewpeople.
As Leonard McCoy put it, "just who in the fuck thought that was a good idea, anyway?!"
That's Bones for ya. Always had the balls to point out design flaws. "A giant satellite dish? In this day and age? Won't it snap off?"
I never objected to anything. I have some concerns, maybe, and there are certainly things I don't like about it. But I'm not going to let that curb my open-mindedness to enjoy what I hope is going to be a good film."Desperation" more accurately describes the trivial, clinging objections to this as-yet-unseen film...
Oh, I'm sure the sexual situations are quite tame. It's just I can't recall seeing such "situations" even as overt as the ones in the trailer in a PG movie that's been released in anytime in the past twenty years. In a post-PG-13 world it just doesn't happen very often--if at all. And the violence so far seems only worse than a typical PG movie only in that there's a little bit of blood shown.The reasons given for the PG-13 is quite unsurprising. In retrospect, the sexual situations would have made PG extremely unlikely, and they never would have made an R-rated Trek movie.
Settle down there, Tiger. As far as we know, the sexual situations don't get any more intense than what we see in the trailers which is pretty lame by even PG standards. Not to mention the fact that under the MPAA rating it says "brief sexual situation." What's giving it the rating is the action and violence and that's not surprising.
Perhaps it should have been said, then, that the bridge resembled that one particular Apple Store, in the opinion of the opiner.Shit or get off the pot, as my Dad used to say.
Exactly. Apple stores look nothing like this set - someone said "Apple store" at some point early on and people have been parroting that ever since - evidently most have never actually seen an Apple store.
Well the only one I've ever been in is the one in the Mall of America. (If you want pics, Google 'em.)
Everything (the walls, the ceiling, the tables, the floor) is white. It is completely void of color.
There is a huge display in the back and a half-moon shaped counter thingy in front of it. There are also several displays embedded in the side walls with kiosks beneath them.
It is extremely bright. It is also cold, sterile, and colorless: four words I'd use to describe the bridge.
And for the record the parody originated in an issue of Entertainment weekly. And yes, it's just a parody. It's unfortunate that people are so desperate to cling to this movie that they have to get all upset over a nudge and wink.![]()
The nudge has worn through clothing and skin, and the wink is looking like an unwelcome advance.
The nudge has worn through clothing and skin, and the wink is looking like an unwelcome advance.
The Apple store raped my childhood!![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.