This sentence made me lol. Funny, but I understand perfectly what it means.basically modeled on Han Solo if Han Solo had been a wholesome sitcom dad
One other thing to remember about Space Academy. While live-action shows on Saturday morning weren't unheard of back in the mid-1970s - we'd had things like Isis and Shazam - it was still primarily the domain of low-budgeted cartoons for the most part. Cheesy or not, it was still considered quite the thing to have an actual spaceship-based live action sci-fi series (starring Dr. Smith from Lost in Space, yet!) on Saturday morning. And in fact - someone correct me if I'm misremembering - I think in 1977 it was the only space-based SF series on the American airwaves. Galactica didn't come along until 1978 and Buck Rogers in 1979. The sitcom Quark might have been on around this time, though.
Alex
Yes, but only in reruns...1999 ended in the spring of '77, while SA debuted in the fall.One other thing to remember about Space Academy. While live-action shows on Saturday morning weren't unheard of back in the mid-1970s - we'd had things like Isis and Shazam - it was still primarily the domain of low-budgeted cartoons for the most part. Cheesy or not, it was still considered quite the thing to have an actual spaceship-based live action sci-fi series (starring Dr. Smith from Lost in Space, yet!) on Saturday morning. And in fact - someone correct me if I'm misremembering - I think in 1977 it was the only space-based SF series on the American airwaves. Galactica didn't come along until 1978 and Buck Rogers in 1979. The sitcom Quark might have been on around this time, though.
Alex
Space 1999 would have been on.
I mean the Tv series from 77.
Does it have aliens?
Yes, but only in reruns...1999 ended in the spring of '77, while SA debuted in the fall.Space 1999 would have been on.
To help tempt you into at least sampling it, here's the intro. Pretty sweet for it's time.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUPK2OPp91E&feature=related
Yes, but only in reruns...1999 ended in the spring of '77, while SA debuted in the fall.Space 1999 would have been on.
Getting super pedantic here but online sources say otherwise.
And that implicit far-far-future setting is part of what's cool about SA conceptually. Because basically what it's showing us, in its own simplified way, is a transhuman far future in which humanity has evolved/been engineered with special abilities and the entire population apparently resides in space habitats. Throw in the sentient AIs, and it's kind of reminiscent of Iain M. Banks's Culture. As an original/tie-in SF author, I would love to do a full-on Space Academy/Star Command reboot that would flesh out those implied aspects of the universe.
Why not go ahead and write your ideas without it explicitly being Space Academy/Star Command? I seem to to recall folks who have taken things written specifically for one franchise or another, and re-making them into their own worlds. See David Gerrold and the evoloution of his book Starhunt (which morphed into Star Wolf, which also incorporated stuff originally intended to be used somewhere else), for example.
To help tempt you into at least sampling it, here's the intro. Pretty sweet for it's time.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUPK2OPp91E&feature=related
That descriptive text contains the same error that seems to show up in all the reference sources, claiming the show is "set in 3732." We don't know that, and in fact it seems very unlikely. Jonathan Harris's narration in the main titles says that the Space Academy was "founded in the star year 3732." For one thing, there's no reason to think the show is set in the same year the Academy was founded. If anything, it seems to be a well-established institution -- and there's one episode where a derelict ship from a thousand years before happens to look exactly like the Academy (in order to save money on sets), which suggests that the show could be set a millennium after the Academy's founding. And for another thing, it stands to reason that something called "the star year 3732" would not be the same as the Gregorian year 3732 CE (or AD). The nomenclature suggests that the Academy was founded 3,732 "star years" into humanity's starfaring age, which could be counted from 1957 (Sputnik) or 1969 (Apollo 11) or possibly some future date when humanity finally colonizes space or develops an interstellar drive. Not to mention that we can't assume a "star year" is equal in length to one revolution of Earth around the Sun.
So there's really no way of knowing when Space Academy takes place, but it's very probably much, much later in time than 3732 CE.
And that implicit far-far-future setting is part of what's cool about SA conceptually. Because basically what it's showing us, in its own simplified way, is a transhuman far future in which humanity has evolved/been engineered with special abilities and the entire population apparently resides in space habitats. Throw in the sentient AIs, and it's kind of reminiscent of Iain M. Banks's Culture. As an original/tie-in SF author, I would love to do a full-on Space Academy/Star Command reboot that would flesh out those implied aspects of the universe.
Yes, but only in reruns...1999 ended in the spring of '77, while SA debuted in the fall.
Getting super pedantic here but online sources say otherwise.
Well, there doesn't seem to have been much of an overlap, just a couple of episodes' worth in Space: 1999's case.
Why not go ahead and write your ideas without it explicitly being Space Academy/Star Command? I seem to to recall folks who have taken things written specifically for one franchise or another, and re-making them into their own worlds. See David Gerrold and the evoloution of his book Starhunt (which morphed into Star Wolf, which also incorporated stuff originally intended to be used somewhere else), for example.
I don't think it'd be kosher to do that if I didn't have the rights to the property. If I want to explore those ideas, I can easily do them in my own original universe(s) rather than trying to imitate something else. What Gerrold did with Star Wolf isn't the same thing, because that's all based on ideas he conceived himself while working on TNG and a failed series premise of his own. He was getting his own concepts out in a different format, not just copying a show he had no personal connection to.
And trust me, pro editors don't look kindly on "original" SF that's just fanfic with the names changed. That's the stuff of amateurs. SA/JoSC is obscure enough that they might not recognize it, but it would be unprofessional and dishonest of me to copy it and try to pass it off as my own.
This sentence made me lol. Funny, but I understand perfectly what it means.basically modeled on Han Solo if Han Solo had been a wholesome sitcom dad![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.