I'm not denying that legally you are right.. but when people say fan fiction.. they mean in terms of how the story worksThat doesn't make it fan fiction. I personally don't think that TPM fits but that doesn't make it fan fiction.
I'm not denying that legally you are right.. but when people say fan fiction.. they mean in terms of how the story worksThat doesn't make it fan fiction. I personally don't think that TPM fits but that doesn't make it fan fiction.
this is an absurd argument. Just because someone has the money to buy the rights to a property, doesn't change the fact that the content they add to it doesn't feel like it belongs. UGH
OK, I could actually see that argument almost working with Holdo. I still don't think she qualifies, but she's at least closer to one than Rey is.She is a composite character combining Luke Skywalker with the strong female action hero cliche and the Jesus savior type ala Superman,John Connor etc. If SW has any Mary Sue it would be Admiral Holdo. Shows up out of nowhere and is put in charge with the blessing of a Iconic character. Used to make one of leads look bad. Serves no long term function for franchise then dies a hero death. Not sure if it counts since isn't a lead. She might just be a poorly executed antagist since the entire mutiny feels like filler. Something to cuttaway to from the main Luke/Rey stuff. Jason
Yes, but like the Mary Sue term, the term fan fiction also has weight in its meaning. So, if you are going to use the term let's make sure we are all in agreement of its use.I'm not denying that legally you are right.. but when people say fan fiction.. they mean in terms of how the story works
Source?KK herself.
That which is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.KK herself.
I'd like to note that usually when people try to defend a position by pointing out the exact definitions of words, they get dismissed with "language evolves". But apparently "Mary Sue" is somehow set in stone with the most strict interpretation, and anything that falls short doesn't count.
You seem to miss the fact that Disney has the right to do what they want because they've purchased Star Wars. They owe nothing to you. They owe nothing to me. They can choose to make the Benioff & Weiss trilogy completely CGI starring only purple elephants as Jedi. I for one don't care to see only purple elephants as Jedi. But its their right to do so if they so choose.
You don't like what Disney has done with Star Wars. Others don't either. However, the sequel trilogy has been EXTREMELY profitable. And that financial success suggests that they will continue down the road they're on. That The Rise of Skywalker has done extremely well in presales already is a good early indication that they are doing maybe what mass audiences want to see. The point being: The majority of people who go see a Star Wars films do not post on the internet. They do not watch YouTube videos. They watch the movies. They enjoy them or they don't. And hopefully they go see the next one. End of story.
As I have tried to suggest many times: Disney is a business. A business is there to be profitable. Even moreso, they have a fiduciary responsibility to its shareholders. They make the decisions based on data that neither you nor I do not have at our fingertips. I do not agree with every decision Disney has made with Star Wars but at the end of the day, I'm still entertained. And many others are as well.
No more so than Luke is a Marty Stu
yeah that was the point of the story and was hinted at by Vader .. are you dence .. maybe you missed that.
Either they’re both (Rey, Luke) “Mary Sue’s”, or neither are. They both pull off amazing feats with little to no training.
he real difference between Luke and Rey is the same as the difference between active and passive .. Luke, and characters like him, have clear goals (learn the force and save the princess, or fighting crime or avenging their puppy) , characters like Rey don't..
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.