Is It Time for a Bold New Star Trek Paradigm?

[Tim Walker]

Ship, station, school, colony, service, politics, civilian, medical, leaving home, going home. What else?

Star Trek meets the X-Files.

 

[Christmas Canon Spock]

Ship, station, school, colony, service, politics, civilian, medical, leaving home, going home. What else?

Retirement.

Recovery.

Under da sea!

 

[Paul Weaver]

Gunsmoke had 635 episodes and seven TV movies, which is impressive.

Under 400 hours. About half of treks output.

 

[FlyingWave]

my biggest criticism about star trek in general was always that its not enough sci fi. but its obviously because the lack of badget. what i mean by it is that alien races in the shows all act like humans, and (because of budget limitation) all humanoid with makeup. there isnt enough "wierd" like what would you expect from sci fi to be. that also true about different planets in the old shows who most of them look exactly like earth. the problem is that in a new coat of paint come together bad writing. because the writing of the old shows was clearly better

 

[Santa Kang]

my biggest criticism about star trek in general was always that its not enough sci fi. but its obviously because the lack of badget. what i mean by it is that alien races in the shows all act like humans, and (because of budget limitation) all humanoid with makeup. there isnt enough "wierd" like what would you expect from sci fi to be. that also true about different planets in the old shows who most of them look exactly like earth. the problem is that in a new coat of paint come together bad writing. because the writing of the old shows was clearly better

There is more to SF than Weird Aliens and Planets.

 

[Detached Nacelle]

There is more to SF than Weird Aliens and Planets.

Exactly. There's also robots.

 

[Danja]

Imagine a Star fleet crew exploring an entirely new region of space — a setting not dominated by humanoid species. Still grounded in Trek values.

Non-humanoid species = Hella expensive to produce.

 

[Divinity Davey]

Gilligan's Spaceport?

Though I believe that was already done ...

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Mudd]

my biggest criticism about star trek in general was always that its not enough sci fi. but its obviously because the lack of badget. what i mean by it is that alien races in the shows all act like humans, and (because of budget limitation) all humanoid with makeup. there isnt enough "wierd" like what would you expect from sci fi to be. that also true about different planets in the old shows who most of them look exactly like earth. the problem is that in a new coat of paint come together bad writing. because the writing of the old shows was clearly better

Absolutely.

 

[Quantum21]

Before I get to my main point, let me start by saying: I’ve been a lifelong Star Trek fan. I’ve enjoyed every era of Trek to varying degrees — including much of the modern content.

But lately, it feels like both the fans and the powers-that-be are stuck in a loop.

Let me explain with a thought experiment: imagine Star Trek: The Original Series never aired in the 1960s, but instead debuted in the 2000s. Imagine Gene Roddenberry was alive today and launched a modern version of Trek. We all fall in love with the characters, and it becomes a major franchise. As this new era comes to an end, fans and studios are buzzing online about how to continue it. Some suggest a Sulu spinoff. Others want series centered around supporting characters from the Enterprise crew.

What would likely follow? Probably shows like Strange New Worlds or Picard — series built directly on existing characters and settings.

And yet, when Roddenberry launched The Next Generation, he didn’t take the easy, commercially safe route. Nobody was asking for a new crew 100 years in the future — but that’s what we got. It wasn’t a financial decision, it was a creative one. A bold one. Instead of clinging to familiar characters, Roddenberry pushed Trek forward. Sure, Dr. McCoy made a cameo in the pilot, but TNG was essentially a clean slate — and it worked.

What followed was a rich era of storytelling: DS9, Voyager, Enterprise — mostly rooted in that new foundation.

Since then, we’ve circled back with prequels (Enterprise, Discovery, SNW) and legacy continuations (Picard). And while we’ve seen creative variations like Lower Decks and Prodigy, they’re still anchored in familiar time periods and established canon.

I get it. Fans want more of what they love — more Picard, more Spock, more 24th-century lore. That’s natural. But if the internet existed in 1986, I bet most fans would’ve preferred more Kirk and Spock back then too.

So here’s the question:
How does Star Trek reinvent itself without losing its identity?

You can tweak the format. Change the tone. Add animated comedy. But what Star Trek really needs, in my opinion, is a true paradigm shift — like TNG was to TOS. But perhaps an even bigger one. A new age or mode of discovery.

Here’s my idea:
All 11 Trek series and 13 movies (so far) have mostly taken place within the Milky Way galaxy. So, what if the next evolution of Star Trek is set in another galaxy?

Imagine a Star fleet crew exploring an entirely new region of space — a setting not dominated by humanoid species. Still grounded in Trek values. Still with some human characters to keep it relatable. But narratively unshackled from Klingons, Romulans, and even the Federation as we know it.

Would it be popular? I don’t know.
Would it feel like Trek? I believe it could — if it holds true to the spirit of exploration, ethics, and discovery.

For the record, I love a lot of modern Trek. Big fan of Picard Season 3 and Strange New Worlds. I still enjoy the TNG era deeply, and of course, TOS will always be special.

Would I love to see more from those eras? Absolutely.

But looking at the big picture, maybe it’s time for Trek to step beyond the familiar. I’m not talking about genre-bending or changing its core identity — I’m talking about injecting it with fresh energy the way TNG once did but still Star Trek at its heart. As much as Lower Decks and Discovery was different, its still tied to the established eras within Trek. Yes Discovery went to the 32nd century, and maybe that's where it should of started , Maybe a more universally praised/executed version of that series set in the future from day 1 would of worked.

What do you think? Is it time for a bold new direction ? Or should we just be happy with more variations within tge existing eras?

Before I get to my main point, let me start by saying: I’ve been a lifelong Star Trek fan. I’ve enjoyed every era of Trek to varying degrees — including much of the modern content.

But lately, it feels like both the fans and the powers-that-be are stuck in a loop.

Let me explain with a thought experiment: imagine Star Trek: The Original Series never aired in the 1960s, but instead debuted in the 2000s. Imagine Gene Roddenberry was alive today and launched a modern version of Trek. We all fall in love with the characters, and it becomes a major franchise. As this new era comes to an end, fans and studios are buzzing online about how to continue it. Some suggest a Sulu spinoff. Others want series centered around supporting characters from the Enterprise crew.

What would likely follow? Probably shows like Strange New Worlds or Picard — series built directly on existing characters and settings.

And yet, when Roddenberry launched The Next Generation, he didn’t take the easy, commercially safe route. Nobody was asking for a new crew 100 years in the future — but that’s what we got. It wasn’t a financial decision, it was a creative one. A bold one. Instead of clinging to familiar characters, Roddenberry pushed Trek forward. Sure, Dr. McCoy made a cameo in the pilot, but TNG was essentially a clean slate — and it worked.

What followed was a rich era of storytelling: DS9, Voyager, Enterprise — mostly rooted in that new foundation.

Since then, we’ve circled back with prequels (Enterprise, Discovery, SNW) and legacy continuations (Picard). And while we’ve seen creative variations like Lower Decks and Prodigy, they’re still anchored in familiar time periods and established canon.

I get it. Fans want more of what they love — more Picard, more Spock, more 24th-century lore. That’s natural. But if the internet existed in 1986, I bet most fans would’ve preferred more Kirk and Spock back then too.

So here’s the question:
How does Star Trek reinvent itself without losing its identity?

You can tweak the format. Change the tone. Add animated comedy. But what Star Trek really needs, in my opinion, is a true paradigm shift — like TNG was to TOS. But perhaps an even bigger one. A new age or mode of discovery.

Here’s my idea:
All 11 Trek series and 13 movies (so far) have mostly taken place within the Milky Way galaxy. So, what if the next evolution of Star Trek is set in another galaxy?

Imagine a Star fleet crew exploring an entirely new region of space — a setting not dominated by humanoid species. Still grounded in Trek values. Still with some human characters to keep it relatable. But narratively unshackled from Klingons, Romulans, and even the Federation as we know it.

Would it be popular? I don’t know.
Would it feel like Trek? I believe it could — if it holds true to the spirit of exploration, ethics, and discovery.

For the record, I love a lot of modern Trek. Big fan of Picard Season 3 and Strange New Worlds. I still enjoy the TNG era deeply, and of course, TOS will always be special.

Would I love to see more from those eras? Absolutely.

But looking at the big picture, maybe it’s time for Trek to step beyond the familiar. I’m not talking about genre-bending or changing its core identity — I’m talking about injecting it with fresh energy the way TNG once did but still Star Trek at its heart. As much as Lower Decks and Discovery was different, its still tied to the established eras within Trek. Yes Discovery went to the 32nd century, and maybe that's where it should of started , Maybe a more universally praised/executed version of that series set in the future from day 1 would of worked.

What do you think? Is it time for a bold new direction ? Or should we just be happy with more variations within tge existing eras?

Discovery was everything fans wanted: new, fresh, rewriting visual language for the 21st century and well, look at the higher than normal complaints.

Academy is the first show starting completely in a new era from the beginning and with the rebuilding of the Federation as its mission. It looks to be the freshest new take of Trek since TNG.

 

[SatrianiRules]

we often hear the terms "reimagining" or "For modern audiences".

Quite frankly I think this is unnecessary. So does that mean you are trying to be more relevant to younger demographics? well guess what, younger demographics appreciate good characters and story telling as much as any other demographic...frankly i think it undersells them to think that they have to change the timbre simply to accommodate their idiosyncrasies.

a good story is a good story no matter when it was made or told, "To Kill a Mockingbird" for example...I'm sure there are others...


Keep that focus and the rest should take care of itself, whatever direction they decide to go in.

 

[Mudd]

we often hear the terms "reimagining" or "For modern audiences".

Quite frankly I think this is unnecessary. So does that mean you are trying to be more relevant to younger demographics? well guess what, younger demographics appreciate good characters and story telling as much as any other demographic...frankly i think it undersells them to think that they have to change the timbre simply to accommodate their idiosyncrasies.

a good story is a good story no matter when it was made or told, "To Kill a Mockingbird" for example...I'm sure there are others...


Keep that focus and the rest should take care of itself, whatever direction they decide to go in.

If only the data supported that...

 

[Borgminister]

Exactly. There's also robots.

...and lizards!