Praxius said:
The core basics of dating is to get to know someone to determine if there is any chance of a future relationship together.... but mere dating can only go so far and you can only learn so much. If you leave that as your only tool of learning about your partner before deciding to marry them, you can end up with all sorts of unforseen situations, traits in your partner, things you may not have thought of before hand..... then what?
Suck it up and say "Well, I married them?"
Ah, that is my sister in a nutshell.
My parents (conservative Jews) managed to raise three children, none of whom married a Jew.
My older sister? My parents couldn't see her "living in sin"--but boy do they wish she had. Not that he's a bad guy, but both have difficult personalities, they are both ill-suited to the other (heck, likely ill-suited to any emotionally healthy person), and their children are paying the price. Not pretty at all. But...they're 20 years married and look to be staying that way.
My older brother? Married his high-school sweetheart. Ahhhh, right? Geez, last time I visited, the amount of yelling that was
normal for them literally hurt my ears. Oh, Hubby and I can yell, but it's nowhere near that common.
Hubby and I? We lived together 9 years before marrying--though we knew--or at least very strongly suspected--that once we were together, that was it.
If my siblings had lived with their spouses even ONE year before marrying, I doubt they would've married at all. They would've had their eyes opened at how ill-suited they were. While some friends and family who know me and Hubby say this or that about us (we can spat sometimes, not yelling argue, but spat), when asked if they could imagine us apart or with someone else, they can't.
But, I DO think there's a difference between living together and being married. There are legal, social, and emotional effects. These very differences are the reasons gay people wish to marry.
BTW, anybody else hear about the guy here in CA who wants to have divorce banned? He says that if marriage is so sacrosanct, divorce should not be allowed. Now, most people will acknowledge that this should not happen for practical reasons (abusive marriages, etc)--yet if these couples had lived together before marriage (sans producing kids who would legally bind them even without marriage), the relationship wold be easier--at least legally though maybe not emotionally--to end. Groups against gay marriage have spoken up as against banning divorce, from what I've read, solely on the grounds of impracticality. I dunno, that seems hypocritical that they can't come up with another reason to be against it (even if practicality is sufficient).