• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Intrepid Class Starship/Arleigh Burke-class destroyer

Jeffmw078

Ensign
Newbie
130920-N-NX070-025_-_USS_Arleigh_Burke_%28DDG-51%29.jpg
latest


What do you all think with a view upgrades could the Intrepid Class Starship be a Starfleet version of the US Navy's Arleigh Burke-class destroyer?
 
Might be, if we say that the Saladin class destroyer of the previous century was the Spruance: a ridiculously oversized pseudo-cruiser built around a "common hull" so that future junk could be crammed in as needed.

Intrepid would then be the similarly sized ship that is filled to capacity with nice-to-have gadgets straight off the slipway. Except for one thing: Intrepid never was short on shuttlecraft facilities, while Burke originally was handicapped by lack thereof!

Timo Saloniemi
 
130920-N-NX070-025_-_USS_Arleigh_Burke_%28DDG-51%29.jpg
latest


What do you all think with a view upgrades could the Intrepid Class Starship be a Starfleet version of the US Navy's Arleigh Burke-class destroyer?

Perhaps you could explain the equivalencies for those of us who aren't that familiar with naval vessels?

Kor
 
I'm familiar with naval vessels (going back a few millennia) and I'm not sure what the purpose of this thread is...so..?

I'm guessing the idea is that the U.S.S. Voyager (i.e. Intrepid class) could be used as a mass production design intended to fill the role of a large destroyer or small cruiser type of starship. That's not impossible.

If you did intend to do so, keep in mind that fitting a ship out for multiple missions (as an Intrepid would be) would reduce its potential effectiveness in some areas. Basically, the more variety of systems you try to cram into a small ship - the less you can focus on a particular mission or - you have to make that ship larger to give it the room for better capabilities.

The Intrepid class is a bit larger than the old 23rd century Constitution class starships (either the original or refit) and has a fair bit of space. If you are wanting to create a serious combat focused ship from that platform - sure, I suppose that would work but, I would probably go for the smaller Defiant class for that. Cheaper to thump out in quantity (and remember boys and girls 'quantity has a quality all it's own'). The Defiant would be more agile and also would have a small crew requirement (not that the Intrepid's were bad there) and is built specifically for combat.
 
I mean the Intrepid design may just be good enough for 'Warp Dynamics' that it may just become a template for future designs, thus why it keeps reoccurring. Future Star Trek classes do seem to edge away from a circular saucer to triangular hulls, even the weird time-war designs. On a smaller ship who can't just 'force it' with a bigger warp field/plant/we, it may help with the energy costs.
 
I can see the addition on a pylon on the strongback for attaching specialized modules as with the Nebula class, a feature seen on a couple of the Voyager early sketches. This would allow for extra equipment without impacting interior volume and with a swapout to a BFG weapons pod you suddenly have a great combat vessel
 
Last edited:
I mean the Intrepid design may just be good enough for 'Warp Dynamics' that it may just become a template for future designs, thus why it keeps reoccurring. Future Star Trek classes do seem to edge away from a circular saucer to triangular hulls, even the weird time-war designs. On a smaller ship who can't just 'force it' with a bigger warp field/plant/we, it may help with the energy costs.
I honestly think that's just because someone in the staff likes the look.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top