http://www.newsarama.com/film/star-trek-into-darkness-khan-theory.html This is over at Newsarama. Not really spoilers. Just an interesting theory this guy came up for the identity of Cumberbatch's character. I find it extremely interesting.
I must have missed the original picture...Who did they allege him to be?
I must have missed the original picture...Who did they allege him to be?
-Ricky
It's not just an image.
The whole thing is still on the EW web site if you know where to look.
ahem..... http://backissues.ew.com/storefront...-new-star-trek-kirk-khan/prodEW20130215A.html
It's not just an image.
The whole thing is still on the EW web site if you know where to look.
ahem..... http://backissues.ew.com/storefront...-new-star-trek-kirk-khan/prodEW20130215A.html
Ah, cool.
Still, I wonder if they actually know something or they're just going with the popular theory.
I'd have to assume they know something. I don't think a big time entertainment mag would make such assumptions like say IMDB.
Plus I would think that JJ and company would have a big problem with this either way due to the wide circulation, but everything was kind of pointing onwards Khan being involved all along.
If Abrams pulls the rug out from under moviegoers and the villain is revealed to be utterly unrelated to Khan, there will be a letdown, even for fans indifferent to it being Khan
I wonder if someone just got fired?
Why does "Voyage into the new Star Trek Kirk & Khan" make it sound like Fantastic Voyage?
From the OP article:
If Abrams pulls the rug out from under moviegoers and the villain is revealed to be utterly unrelated to Khan, there will be a letdown, even for fans indifferent to it being Khan
I'm pretty sure fans who are indifferent by definition don't really care who it is. And even if he isn't Khan, is anybody here actually going to be let down?
I know exactly what it says, I'm just not buying that they actually know anything. I think that's just a sloppy web editor, it may turn to be the case, but, I don't believe they have any actual knowledge to support that blurb. Why would JJ choose now to reveal that? It makes no sense to me
Here is what is said about Khan in the actual EW cover story written by Geoff Boucher:
Unconfirmed rumors suggest that Harrison also goes by the name of Khan, the genetically upgraded tyrant portrayed by Ricardo Montalban in a February 1967 episode of the original series, as well as in 1982′s big-screen Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan.
I know exactly what it says, I'm just not buying that they actually know anything. I think that's just a sloppy web editor, it may turn to be the case, but, I don't believe they have any actual knowledge to support that blurb. Why would JJ choose now to reveal that? It makes no sense to me
Why does "Voyage into the new Star Trek Kirk & Khan" make it sound like Fantastic Voyage?
From the OP article:
If Abrams pulls the rug out from under moviegoers and the villain is revealed to be utterly unrelated to Khan, there will be a letdown, even for fans indifferent to it being Khan
I'm pretty sure fans who are indifferent by definition don't really care who it is. And even if he isn't Khan, is anybody here actually going to be let down?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.