It was positive for me...I had skipped VOY & DS9. I missd Trek so much after ENT went off the air, I went back & watched those two series.
in general did Enterprise...
- Thread starter rick
- Start date
For a B&B affair coming on the immediate heels of VOYAGER, it was surprisingly good and had a few engaging characters.
I voted for Indifferent merely because after DS9, which wasn't a horrible series but had the problem of being shuffled around in the schedule so much I know many people just gave up eventually.
Then Voyager came.
THAT series' utter crapness killed off most of the rest of the fanbase.
Enterprise would have had to have been the most exquisitely crafted science fiction epic ever to have even managed to lift Trek's reputation from the doldrums.
As it was Bermaga in charge once more, that was surely not going to be the case.
Consider the obtuse reliance on T&A. How they thoroughly wrecked the Vulcans' image. The poorly designed ship. The poorly designed sets. The poorly thought out characters. The...it goes on.
Sure, there were good 'moments' but the series as a whole if you had to average things out was pretty lousy.
Still it was better than Voyager....
But not good enough.
Then Voyager came.
THAT series' utter crapness killed off most of the rest of the fanbase.
Enterprise would have had to have been the most exquisitely crafted science fiction epic ever to have even managed to lift Trek's reputation from the doldrums.
As it was Bermaga in charge once more, that was surely not going to be the case.
Consider the obtuse reliance on T&A. How they thoroughly wrecked the Vulcans' image. The poorly designed ship. The poorly designed sets. The poorly thought out characters. The...it goes on.
Sure, there were good 'moments' but the series as a whole if you had to average things out was pretty lousy.
Still it was better than Voyager....
But not good enough.
TOS had plenty of T&A, no one complained.
I kinda liked the 22nd century Vulcans, and their attitude was explained in S4
Well it was the Akira class knock off, but I wouldn't call it bad...
Hardly...
They might not have been thoroughly developed, but they were conceived nicely. All of them... Except for Travis, he sucked.
Sure, there were lousy 'moments' but the series as a whole if you had to average things out was pretty good.
Way better than Voyager!
It killed it. They didn't even consider changing the production values. The pilot had barely any music in it at all. The dark clostrophobic submarine atmosphere wasn't helping at all. It looked like a watered down BBC production. The special effects were better but that didn't save it. And Manny Coto? Now there's a guy who could write just anything.
Actually, Dennis McCarthy's soundtrack was pretty good.
Hm, I myself considered it a welcome change in style, after the end of Voyager, that is.
And that means... What, exactly?
Yep, he's... Versatile. That's one of the things I like about him (don't laugh people, but I loved "Odyssey 5")
For a lot of people I don't think any series that came at this time would have been "good enough" unless they got to cast, write and direct the series. That is what we have come to in the "internet empowered" age.
number6
Vice Admiral
For a lot of people I don't think any series that came at this time would have been "good enough" unless they got to cast, write and direct the series. That is what we have come to in the "internet empowered" age.
QFT.. In fact, for further proof all you have to do is look at what those same people are now saying about Trek XI.
Similar threads
