• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

I'm liking the show so far but...

How is "In the Pale Moonlight" an episode about morality? It shows how compromises lead one to bad decisions.

Were they bad decisions and were the decisions truly amoral? I would think not using every tool at your disposal to save lives and possibly end fighting earlier is also an amoral state of being.

Could I pull the trigger on such a plan that essentially sentences four or five people (we also have to remember Vreenak's pilot and guards) to death to possibly save thousands or millions? I don't know? Luckily, I will never be in a position to have to make that kind of choice.

From where I'm sitting, it is math.
 
I always love how Star Trek having a certain outcome indicates the moral rightness of the character's decision.
 
There were many issues being addressed by the episode, making it difficult to encapsulate them all. I believe that a major part of the episode is how the interests of the state can complicate one's moral code.
I think that's more the point. I don't think it is meant to have that clear answer, and its nebulousness is why we are still taking about it 20 years hence.

I think Sisko, even unknowingly, qualifies as an accessory to murder. I also think when called on it, he would admit to it.
I would completely agree.
 
The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few....or something something.
u3Ji0Sx.jpg
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top