And those bad decisions are vindicated as they lead to the desired outcome.How is "In the Pale Moonlight" an episode about morality? It shows how compromises lead one to bad decisions.
And those bad decisions are vindicated as they lead to the desired outcome.How is "In the Pale Moonlight" an episode about morality? It shows how compromises lead one to bad decisions.
Payback can be a bitch. The Romulans killed an entire Starfleet crew, and the lost a senator. I call that a bargain.And those bad decisions are vindicated as they lead to the desired outcome.
How is "In the Pale Moonlight" an episode about morality? It shows how compromises lead one to bad decisions.
Yeah, that's fucked up logic.Payback can be a bitch. The Romulans killed an entire Starfleet crew, and the lost a senator. I call that a bargain.
There were many issues being addressed by the episode, making it difficult to encapsulate them all. I believe that a major part of the episode is how the interests of the state can complicate one's moral code.Were they bad decisions and were the decisions truly amoral?
Hey, if you want to nitpick, why not go all the way?Yeah, that's fucked up logic.
I always love how Star Trek having a certain outcome indicates the moral rightness of the character's decision.
I think that's more the point. I don't think it is meant to have that clear answer, and its nebulousness is why we are still taking about it 20 years hence.There were many issues being addressed by the episode, making it difficult to encapsulate them all. I believe that a major part of the episode is how the interests of the state can complicate one's moral code.
I would completely agree.I think Sisko, even unknowingly, qualifies as an accessory to murder. I also think when called on it, he would admit to it.
There were many issues being addressed by the episode, making it difficult to encapsulate them all. I believe that a major part of the episode is how the interests of the state can complicate one's moral code.
More like raison d'état does not match up with individual morality. The state will, and often does, things it denies its citizens.Morals of the whole don't always match the morals of the individual?
The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few....or something something.Morals of the whole don't always match the morals of the individual?
The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few....or something something.
Yes, and I would prefer that. I have plenty of other places to get my moral lessons. A TV show isn't my go to.I like "In the Pale Moonlight", it's my favorite episode of DS9, but it's as far from a morality play as you can get.
But someone torn up over pragmatism? Yeah, I can see that.
And those bad decisions are vindicated as they lead to the desired outcome.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.