I'll be on holodeck 4

[Joshonator]

I really don't see how it'd be a violation. At least, not any more of one that when someone masturbates to a picture or dresses a sexdoll up as someone. I mean disturbing, yes, and certainly not to make the person being copied fell to good but, "ethically" not too much different than any other form of masturbation.

Unless someone signs a model release or places them self in the "public eye" it is illegal to publish images of them. Now imagine someone making an exact animated replica of you and having sex with it. It is more than just masturbation, it would be pretty much exactly the same as it would be with that person. So if that person never gave you permission to have access to that, I would consider it a violation.

 

[Timo]

Being co-star in a popular TV show doesn't count?

Seriously speaking, considering the proliferation of visual media recording devices, laws such as above are likely to lose significance pretty soon, if they haven't already (consider the various magazines making profit on nonprofessional photography of random people who get retroactively assigned a "celebrity/public eye" status).

Timo Saloniemi

 

[drazzz52923849]

I really don't see how it'd be a violation. At least, not any more of one that when someone masturbates to a picture or dresses a sexdoll up as someone. I mean disturbing, yes, and certainly not to make the person being copied fell to good but, "ethically" not too much different than any other form of masturbation.

Unless someone signs a model release or places them self in the "public eye" it is illegal to publish images of them. Now imagine someone making an exact animated replica of you and having sex with it. It is more than just masturbation, it would be pretty much exactly the same as it would be with that person. So if that person never gave you permission to have access to that, I would consider it a violation.

I would imagine being in Starfleet or being a public figure would be all of the release you need to be qualified to be programed into the holodeck.

 

[Trekker4747]

I really don't see how it'd be a violation. At least, not any more of one that when someone masturbates to a picture or dresses a sexdoll up as someone. I mean disturbing, yes, and certainly not to make the person being copied fell to good but, "ethically" not too much different than any other form of masturbation.

Unless someone signs a model release or places them self in the "public eye" it is illegal to publish images of them. Now imagine someone making an exact animated replica of you and having sex with it. It is more than just masturbation, it would be pretty much exactly the same as it would be with that person. So if that person never gave you permission to have access to that, I would consider it a violation.

I wouldn't care. If someone wants to get one off on my image more power to them.

 

[Satyrquaze]

I wouldn't care. If someone wants to get one off on my image more power to them.

I'm willing to bet that Deanna Troi and others like her probably have a differing opinion.

 

[YARN]

I'm willing to bet that Deanna Troi and others like her probably have a differing opinion.

Troi - The holodeck is really really great
Riker - For porn
Troi - I’m a senior officer, so I don’t have to wait
Riker - For porn
Troi - Huh? There's always a new holosite,
Riker - For porn!
Troi – Will!

Riker - The holodeck is for porn
The holodeck is for porn
Why you think that deck was born?
Porn porn porn

Troi - That’s gross you’re a pervert
Riker - Ah, sticks and stones counselor
Troi - NO really, your a pervert
Normal people do porn on the holodeck
Riker? - Ohhhh?
Troi - HOLD ON A SECOND!

Now I know for a fact that you, Captain, ride horses and do mystery novels on the holdeck
Picard - That’s correct.
Troi - And Worf, you’re always fighting thing in your programs.
Worf - Sure!
Troi - And Geordi, you keep simulating engine rooms with your deck time.
La Forge - Yes I do!
Troi - And Data, you simulate Sherlock Holmes.
Data - True!
Riker - Oh, but Troi-
What you think he do . . .after? hmm?

I'll leave it to someone else (if it hasn't already happened) to mash up a YouTube video of Avenue Q and TNG.

 

[Marten]

I'm surprised they dared insinuate something like that.

 

[Joshonator]

I wouldn't care. If someone wants to get one off on my image more power to them.

What if that someone was a dirty old man?

 

[Trekker4747]

I wouldn't care. If someone wants to get one off on my image more power to them.

What if that someone was a dirty old man?

Whatever helps him get his rocks off, glad I could help.

If it's not me what difference does it make?

 

[Itisnotlogical]

If Rosamund Pike or Halle Berry wanted to use a holo-me, I'd be most flattered. If it was a dirty old man I'd have a knife under my pillow.

 

[Satyrquaze]

The holodeck is for porn

I kinda hate you just a little bit right now.

 

[drazzz52923849]

I wouldn't care. If someone wants to get one off on my image more power to them.

What if that someone was a dirty old man?

Whatever helps him get his rocks off, glad I could help.

If it's not me what difference does it make?

Exactly. Its not actually you, just an exact replica of you. Its like porn that you take part in. But not really.

 

[Chick_McGeester]

The only problem I would have with someone using a holodeck image of me to have sex with is if they were to film it somehow and spread it or sell it. Then I would object. Otherwise I wouldnt really care. Like other have said, its not me...