• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Ignorance of Science

DarthTimon

Commander
Red Shirt
The human race has come a long way down the centuries. From some very humble beginnings, to developing the means to land probes on other planets. Once, diseases like smallpox were a scourge; now they're all but erased. There was a time when it took weeks, even months, to cross an ocean, at great peril. Now we can on the other side of the world in a day. Whereas messengers would have to run or ride to convey information to distant lands, we can now do so instantly.

These developments are the result of an unrelenting, insatiable desire to learn more, to peel back the layers of creation, and understand what make things work. The pursuit of science has led us to develop some powerful and dangerous weapons, but equally, we have learned all sorts of positive elements too. Why then, do some people desperately cling to ignorance?

I'm inspired to write this because of my experiences with religious fundamentalists. I know of at least one who insists the Biblical narrative is 100% literally true, and no level of evidence or logic will sway them. What's worse, there seems to be a steady rise in people disputing and distrusting science. They reject the science, and expert experience, in favour of their limited armchair research, and their half-hour Google search. Sometimes, in an hilarious-yet-tragic fashion, some of these wilfully ignorant people will lecture those with scholarly credentials, and dare to suggest their 'knowledge' is equivalent.

How can we be in the 21st Century, having learned so much as a species, having overcome so much, see what we have accomplished slide? When did the pursuit of knowledge become something to be derided? How is it that society-at-large seems to be letting the ignorant drive the narrative?

How might we push back against this dangerous rejection of fact and logic?
 
They reject the science...

Science is getting to an odd point of fluidity. Some of the things we thought were true and taught for decades are now under debate, like the Big Bang. That is all the opening many need to question science, front to back.

Not the way I operate, but there is profit in division. There are those out there that drive the anti-science narrative for their own gain.

How is it that society-at-large seems to be letting the ignorant drive the narrative?

More ignorant folks than smart folks. The opening of Idiocracy spelled it out pretty clearly.
 
Gatekeeping makes folks trust science less—like this:


Gradualists/uniformitarianists rejected the Missoula Megaflood concept—no doubt thinking it something a young earther pulled out of his behind:


Impact theory…how asteroid craters and Maar type lunar volcanic craters look similar—all show you have to be very careful when you hear someone claim to be a champion of science—-that can be another form of zealotry.
 
I remember the first time i connected to the internet way back in 1999, it was mind blowing, access to what seemed like the sum knowledge of humanity at your finger tips, at everyones finger tips, and i thought this can only help propel the human race forward even faster in every way for the better, but it seems i was wrong and in fact the internet seems to have actually made a lot of people more stupid.
 
Gemini is a problem.
Even after I asked it about neutral hexanitrogen (a liquid explosive) I asked it about N20 (like N6, an all nitrogen explosive).

It said all nitrogen explosives didn’t exist.

I asked it what spacecraft might intercept 3I/ATLAS.

It said nothing was near….not exactly true:


Gemini needs updating to keep up with the bleeding edge.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top