Spock said he found the Enterprise to be cold.
Then he should wear his thermal underwear
Spock said he found the Enterprise to be cold.
I see the thresh hold being intergalactic travel. At a minimum, a super civilization that can send a robotic probe to another galaxy.7. Why don't we see far more advanced races more often? We used to see them sometimes in TOS but less afterwards. In Star Trek, the Prime Directive prohibits direct contact with Pre-Warp Civilizations. What if there's a similar version of the Prime Directive that Post-Warp Civilizations use? Most of them have no direct contact with Warp Civilizations because they view the Federation as being as primitive as the Federation would see us
At some point circa the early 90s I had a dream in which I was aboard a different version of the Enterprise. It had a bi-level bridge. On the lower level was a much larger main viewscreen, a transporter platform, and a conference area. The upper level had the control stations and the captain's chair, most of which were at the rear except for a few stations along the upper perimeter on both sides. Both levels had transporter niches....very small alcoves where you could step in and instantaneously be transported to the other level. My sense was that these were incorporated throughout the ship....and that 'transporters' were based on an entirely different concept than breaking a body down and beaming it. Perhaps small wormholes or something else. The bridge was not at the top of the ship, but at a lower level in the saucer. At the top was an observation / recreation deck.
Yeah but how realistic is the cantina from Mos Eisley really? Given the wide range of atmospheres, temperatures, and gravitational fields life could evolve in; it seems odd that that many species would find the same environment comfortable to be in. I think it makes much more sense to group species that have similar environmental requirements together on one ship and have that ship accommodate that one environment. Spock said he found the Enterprise to be cold.
I'd make it an actual reboot. None of this namby-pamby DiscoTrek "It's the same even though it looks totally different, has way better technology and the stories all conflict" or the Kelvin "It's an alternate timeline" stuff (which means they can change stuff like how the universe works)
Maybe something like JMS' TOS reboot pitch from 2003 or whenever it was.
If I understand the UFO lore correctly, supposedly several different species have been visiting Earth, and there have been several different UFO crashes.Establish that early Earth/Terran interstellar space craft is retrofitted alien technology
- I don't think it's realistic to have the human race achieve warp capabilities on its own in 45 years (2063) as Star Trek currently calls for. If you want to keep Star Trek in the 23rd century (or 22nd or 24th centuries), you'll have to figure out a way for mankind to get a hold of, and reverse engineer alien technology. Maybe the Romulians or Cardassians briefly occupied Earth for a time, and left behind some technology? Or maybe the Roswell Incident was a result of a time displaced crash-landed Ferengi vessel (Quark!!!), but there were enough parts salvageable to figure out how it worked? Zefram Cochrane could still play a big part here. Maybe he's the one that figured out how the alien technology worked?
and Trek is no longer "our" future, but instead just some parallel universe like the Marvel universe.
Which wouldn't have been necessary if they never introduced Earth dates to begin with. The Eugenics Wars, World War III (hopefully!) First Contact, etc. would have been in some ever perpetual future that were never conclusively tied to Earth dates.It hasn't been OUR future for some time now. It's better to just treat it as its own separate universe that has some parallels with ours. Rather than constantly chasing our tails and rewrite the Star Trek Universe storyline every ten years.
Everyone knows subspace communicators carry way more bulk than 4G. :PDates or not, the technology itself will inevitably become outdated, anyway, as we've already seen with communicators, big chunky computers, padds, etc. You're chasing a 'timelessness' that isn't possible.
Which wouldn't have been necessary if they never introduced Earth dates to begin with. The Eugenics Wars, World War III (hopefully!) First Contact, etc. would have been in some ever perpetual future that were never conclusively tied to Earth dates.
Kirk: Bones, there's a 'thing' out there...it should be about something OUT THERE that makes you think and makes your jaw drop....
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.