all languages are fairly silly constructs...
Certain not cooking.
Two things: (1) being from an American institution and being from (educated in) the US aren't necessarily the same thing. And more importantly: (2) it isn't the CURRENT students who are winning Nobel Prizes. The US is falling behind in math and science -- this is not up for debate.
I would say a bigger hurdle to accepting metric is that if you are raised on the imperial system your brain is wired for it.
I tell you I'm 190 pounds, you immediately know exactly how heavy that is. I tell you I'm 80kg, you are probably mentally converting it to pounds before you understand it. It's like learning to speak a second language. When you first start using it you're translating it in your head before you understand it. When you've been immersed in it for a while, then you start being able to think in the other language.
So if you suddenly switched all the highway signs from miles to km it would cause a lot of short term frustration and confusion. If you started putting both miles and km on a highway sign, people who grew up on miles would just look at the miles. The only real way to get people to switch over is to use it exclusively in schools and then wait a while.
I made this thread to the TNG section originally, couldn't delete it there but might as well post it here..
As we know, starship personnel use metres and other non imperial measurements in their work and on dialog. If you're from a country that uses imperial measurements, like foot and pounds, in your everydays life, how do you react to these metres and grams. For me personally it's easy because we use the metric system in our everyday life, kilometres don't have to be thought as how many miles is that...
Also in imperial unit countries, scientists still use metrics.
But even if you spent your entire life in a cattle ranch in the midwest wrapped in an American flag and have no idea what metrics are, the context always gives the audience everything they need to know. "Enemy ship is at 20000 kilometers and closing. 15000 kilometers. 10000 kilometers!" Even if you have no idea how long a kilometer is, you understand enough to get the scene.
I would say a bigger hurdle to accepting metric is that if you are raised on the imperial system your brain is wired for it.
I tell you I'm 190 pounds, you immediately know exactly how heavy that is. I tell you I'm 80kg, you are probably mentally converting it to pounds before you understand it. It's like learning to speak a second language. When you first start using it you're translating it in your head before you understand it. When you've been immersed in it for a while, then you start being able to think in the other language.
You can almost call it a matter of language or just a different country's custom, IMO. I think commonly most everyday people in the U.S. are just used to thinking and communicating in inches, feet, and miles because that's the reference system (along with the Fahrenheit scale) that's been used--and continues to be used--by most of their family and friends. Metric is probably considered just "that thing" that is taught in classrooms, but is left there when they go home. This doesn't mean that metric isn't used for scientific and industrial purposes in the U.S. though.^Like you I have to convert tempature to celsius to understand how hot/cold etc.. that is, but when I see a temapture written down that doesn't mention scale I read it as celsisus first.
And as has been pointed out several countries have converted from Imperial to metric, US teaches metric in school. So is it really a big hurdle to change systems in the US?
Actually, the way the Fahrenheit temperature scale was calculated makes even less sense than that.Does anyone know how the farenheit scale was callibrated? It just seems like it's based on 0-100 is the usual range of temperatures in a temperate climate.
According to Wikipedia 0 is the temperature of brine and 100 is the human body temperature. That seems pretty arbitrary.
I don't see the US government ever changing the system by force. I don't know how it is in Europe, but that's something the US would consider overreaching the government's authority and intruding too much on people's personal lives. What they might do is start teaching children exclusively in metric then adding both imperial and metric to signs.
Does anyone know how the farenheit scale was callibrated? It just seems like it's based on 0-100 is the usual range of temperatures in a temperate climate.
According to Wikipedia 0 is the temperature of brine and 100 is the human body temperature. That seems pretty arbitrary.
I don't see the US government ever changing the system by force. I don't know how it is in Europe, but that's something the US would consider overreaching the government's authority and intruding too much on people's personal lives. What they might do is start teaching children exclusively in metric then adding both imperial and metric to signs.
Maybe we should all just switch to Kelvin.
I don't know how it is in Europe, but that's something the US would consider overreaching the government's authority and intruding too much on people's personal lives.
And the American citizens (the people who own the government) have the authority to throw any politician stupid enough to back a change to the metric system into the street at election time.But as I've already pointed out they have the authority to do so under the US Constition Article 1 Section VIII, I believe it is.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.