I vote for ridges. It's the most easily recognizable look, and the new movie's continuity should go for that. No need to pander to the "canon violation!" crowd.
Given the nature that JJ doesn't like Alien looking aliens in the new Star Trek flick, I think we're going ridgeless. After all, he humanized the Gorn.
Given the nature that JJ doesn't like Alien looking aliens in the new Star Trek flick, I think we're going ridgeless. After all, he humanized the Gorn.
I would vote for ridges because that's the way Roddenberry meant them to be. He just didn't have the fundage for latex make-up until The Motionless Picture...
Roddenberry never "meant" for the Klingons to be anything in particular until after the fact. They were invented by Gene L. Coon and the original makeup was improvised from available materials - with no lead time at all, according to several accounts - by Fred Phillips.
One might reasonably wonder what, if anything, Gene Coon would have "meant" for the Klingons to look like, but it's a moot point. This late in the day, Roddenberry's retrospective "intentions" regarding the many aspects of Trek that he at most passed approval on is not a particularly strong argument in favor of any of them.
Even, before ENT showed the augment virus explanation, I easily accepted the fanon solution of there being multiple races within the empire. For a future Abrams-verse project, I would like to see the ridge-heads be the prominent ones, but maybe have them being secretly ordered around by a smooth head, or maybe even have a political officer-type character like in Hunt for Red October (the guy Ramius snaps the neck of before the defection) be portrayed by a smooth head.
You know, I don't quite get this either/or type of thinking; it's not a truly contradictory concept, it's two facets of the same idea. Instead of forcing them to choose, why not look to see what each idea can bring to the project in their own unique way?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.