"I refuse to board an aircraft of any kind."Data: "I express remorse for those less intelligent."
That argument was never raised, but I suspect they would have claimed "salvage rights" or claimed Data under probate or something.
As it is though, the episode has a great point: Just because Data is a machine (by conventional standards) it does not necessarily follow that he is "property."
Picard: They are living, sentient beings. Their rights and privileges in our society have been defined. I helped define them.
Haftel: Yes, yes. I'm more than willing to acknowledge that. And you must acknowledge that Lal might be a technological step forward in the development of artificial intelligence.
Picard: A most significant step.
Haftel: And work like this demands strictly controlled procedures.
Picard: Which Commander Data is following.
Haftel: In effective isolation, and that is unacceptable to Starfleet Research.
Beat as they study each other. Haftel softens a bit, trying to sound more reasonable.
Haftel: This is not personal, Captain. There are very real dangers here. Without peer review, Starfleet fears we're risking another M-5 catastrophe.
Picard: That is a forced parallel, Admiral. M-5 was a battle computer.
Haftel: With an artificial intelligence that led to disaster. Does this new android have the same dangerous potential? I don't know, and that is my point. The blame of the M-5 catastrophe can be laid entirely on the fact that Dr. Daystrom was working in effective isolation. And that cannot be permitted to happen again.
Picard: I respect the need for peer review and control precautions. I would submit that you will find them here aboard the Enterprise. My crew has served for years with Data. Unlike your research people, we have enough experience to reliably judge what is "normal" and "abnormal" behavior for Soong-type androids. We are uniquely qualified to assist in guiding Lal's development.
Haftel: That is what I'm here to decide, Captain.
Whoa!Riker: And you brought us here, exposed us to it, cost us the lives of our shipmates...
Riker's calm breaks -- he physically moves to assault Q.
Q: Stop -- or you will surely die.
LaForge is not likely to bend or break orders, that's not his style. Picard does it all the time.Picard wouldn't have tried to help Data flee. It is more likely that LaForge would have tried to since they were 'friends'.
LaForge is not likely to bend or break orders, that's not his style. Picard does it all the time.Picard wouldn't have tried to help Data flee. It is more likely that LaForge would have tried to since they were 'friends'.
Suppose Data had lost the trial (or hearing) in Measure of a Man.
Would he have fled?
And if so, would Picard have helped him, for instance by securing a free shuttle for him to use?
If Data is property, how can he be bound by Starfleet rules anyway, so he might have felt it was the right thing to do to flee.
And by the way this early episode really shows there are serious problems with the Starfleet high command.
Not necessarily, I own a cat who I paid nothing for, he is my property. I am legally responsible for him, and his actions.I can understand that argument if Data had been built by Starfleet. But the fact he was built by an outside party, with no affiliation whatsoever to Starfleet, would seem to automatically preclude that.
Not exactly, courts have ruled that corporations have rights and responsibilities similar to those of a natural person. But they can't legally do everything a natural person can, it doesn't go that far, they are a "legal person."The government views corporations as living things, already.Then corporations would be people.Suppose Data had lost the trial (or hearing) in Measure of a Man.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.