Thanks! And, yes, I brought Gorgan back in that one. Really.
And I've honestly never forgiven you for that.
Thanks! And, yes, I brought Gorgan back in that one. Really.
If novels-as-sequels is an idea that appeals, then you'll want to check out my upcoming Star Trek: Titan novel Fortune of War, which is going to be a long-overdue sequel to the third-season Star Trek: The Next Generation episode "The Survivors."
I've only been reading since the Destiny trilogy and forward; Titan, TNG and DS9. Have they retconned everything from the shows that kind of didn't make sense or was contradictory? That would probably please readers who would otherwise be bored with the lack of character development.
Books aren't allowed to outwardly contradict the screen stuff. Plenty of stuff has been recontextualized in a way that improves it, but nothing outright wiped clean.
Nope, nothing's been retconned at all except (sort of) "These Are The Voyages" in The Good That Men Do. And even that wasn't exactly a retcon, more "this was a holodeck simulation, there's no guarantee of veracity when compared to actual events".
Books aren't allowed to outwardly contradict the screen stuff. Plenty of stuff has been recontextualized in a way that improves it, but nothing outright wiped clean.
But that's what "retcon" means -- retroactive continuity, a new story revealing new information about a past event or introducing a continuity relationship between events that didn't previously have one. Revealing that something never happened at all is an extreme example of a retcon, but it's hardly the exclusive meaning of the term. A retcon is anything that modifies our understanding of an event from a prior story.
So, yes, a ton of things in canonical Trek have been retconned by Trek Lit. LikeAnd yes, to woodstock's question, many nonsensical or contradictory things from canonical Trek have been explained or rationalized in the books, although nowhere near everything.Vanguard explaining Project Genesis as an outgrowth of the Taurus Metagenome, or Admiral Cartwright being revealed as a Section 31 member, or my suggestion in DTI that the Eugenics Wars were a front of the Temporal Cold War.
If so, how was STO able to address that catastrophic event? Or was it able to?
Even up until a year ago, IDW's license only allowed them to do TOS, TNG, and the Abrams movies. I gather now they can do the whole franchise, if the Waypoint series is anything to go by.Back in the '90s, comic companies might only have the license to Deep Space Nine but not TNG, for instance.
Even up until a year ago, IDW's license only allowed them to do TOS, TNG, and the Abrams movies. I gather now they can do the whole franchise, if the Waypoint series is anything to go by.
IIRC, they did get the license to do DS9, but after low sales for Fool's Gold they let the license expire. Though, I'm not sure how they were able to use the DS9 characters for the Kelvinverse comics. In fact, I'm very surprised they didn't go with TNG for that one.Has it changed that recently? I know they only had the rights to TOS and TNG when they first acquired the license in 2006 but they expanded it to at least include DS9 as well as the Abrams movies in 2009 (they published a DS9 mini, Fool's Gold, that year). They also used the DS9 characters in the Kelvinverse ongoing in 2014. I just assumed they've had the rights to everything since 2009, they just didn't feel the sales would justify publishing anything with the other series. Even their TNG stuff has been sporadic the last few years, so I figured the sales weren't there.
I figured the studio may not have allowed them use TNG since there's a (remote) possibility they'll do something with a reboot TNG.IIRC, they did get the license to do DS9, but after low sales for Fool's Gold they let the license expire. Though, I'm not sure how they were able to use the DS9 characters for the Kelvinverse comics. In fact, I'm very surprised they didn't go with TNG for that one.
I've often wondered, since the storyline was done up at a time when Orci's third movie was in development, the one that had Shatner returning to restore the Prime Universe or whatever, if there were plans for Kelvinverse versions of the TNG characters in that movie.I figured the studio may not have allowed them use TNG since there's a (remote) possibility they'll do something with a reboot TNG.
IIRC, they did get the license to do DS9, but after low sales for Fool's Gold they let the license expire. Though, I'm not sure how they were able to use the DS9 characters for the Kelvinverse comics. In fact, I'm very surprised they didn't go with TNG for that one.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.