By reading the thread it feels like I missed a lot...
Anyway. Considering the OP is a made up story (as testified by the thread), the original poster may be agreeing with me in that Richard Dawkins and his ilk are a real danger to modern society - because of people like the OP's "character" in his story. Yeah, those people really exist. Why are they so dangerous? Because they wrap their prejudices and close-mindedness in a box made of science and logic. They're still horrible people who persecute those who're unlike them, except they do it while using imagery of something impartial. To me, they're no better than religious fundamentalists - yeah, Dawkins is IMO about as dangerous as Al Qaeda. Feel free to disagree with this sentiment, but for Pete's sake, do not post about it here, because all it will cause will be furious argument, and we don't want that.
Temperance and tolerance is what everybody should look out for. You should not care what others do with their time or beliefs, as long as they don't harm you or people you care about. I wouldn't give a damn if a girl I like was Christian, atheist, Muslim, Jewish or Hindu. The only problems I'd have would be various crack cults I won't mention.
And Wicca. I can't treat seriously people who call themselves "witches". But that's just my personal opinion.