Isn't Enterprise supposed to do a re-launch ala DS9? It would be great if they could start the novels with Season 5, and reveal who future guy is. They should get Braga to write it so it coan feel more like an official storyline.
Daniels comment about "None of this is suppose to be happening" in "Carpenter Street was referring to the brutal attack on Earth by the Xindi and the hostility between the two species. And he was right.saul said:
Actually there is no proof of that what so ever. Daniels said that those events aren't suppoed to happen.startrekwatcher said:
Daniels showed Archer the Battle of Procyon V in the 26th century. Daniels might not be from the 26th century but that conflict was in fact part of his history that led to his time period.saul said:He was from the 31st Century. The events he showed Archer were in the 26th.
That is true with regards to the Temporal Cold War. They clearly had no overall idea of where it was heading or the motives of the players involved or who FG was. Although with a TCW you could argue that any inconsistencies in actions by FG was the result of his adjusting his original plan in response to efforts by one or more factions to undermine his requiring a continuous modification. So at one point getting the NX mission cancelled served his goal but later on working with Archer was necessary to correct the temporal interference by others.Guy Gardener said:
They had no plan. They made it up as they went. They make no apologies. That allows for the most creative justifications on part to string together this hodgepodge of a story.
Actually I really do. I stand by my assertion that the time travel logic held up fairly well to scrutiny in season three. B&B might have been sloppy earlier but they did a decent job with the Xindi arc. I do believe that the trip to the Battle of Procyon V definitely showed thinking on the writers' part.You're quite the deductive thinker startrekwatcher, but do you think Braga could follow that or had anything close to a story model following that when he was handing out writing assignments?
I think it did. Daniels said that TCW was ending AND given the temporal prime directive, it would make sense that Daniels would limit Archer to as little information as necessary/possibleKalen Archer said:
I don't think Storm Front wrapped it up adequately
But in the26th Century Daniels shows Archer a timeline that follows if Archer failed. The Spheres which created the expanse should not be there. The expanse we see in the 26th century is a result of it expanding from the 22nd. So this is not a past of Daniels because without the Spheres tyhere is no expanse.startrekwatcher said:
Daniels comment about "None of this is suppose to be happening" in "Carpenter Street was referring to the brutal attack on Earth by the Xindi and the hostility between the two species. And he was right.saul said:
Actually there is no proof of that what so ever. Daniels said that those events aren't suppoed to happen.startrekwatcher said:
Daniels showed Archer the Battle of Procyon V in the 26th century. Daniels might not be from the 26th century but that conflict was in fact part of his history that led to his time period.saul said:He was from the 31st Century. The events he showed Archer were in the 26th.
If the Sphere Builders hadn't told the Xindi Earth was a threat then Earth wouldn't have been attacked in 2153, 7 million wouldn't have died, Archer's mission wouldn't have taken him to the Expanse this early, the NX wouldn't have been in the Expanse for a year, the Andorians wouldn't have gotten the Xindi prototype etc etc.
Daniels took Archer to the 26th century to show him the Battle at Procyon V in order to let him understand in more detail why someone from the future had pitted Earth and the Xindi against one another in the 22nd century. And as we heard in "Azati Prime", the Sphere Builders lied to the Xindi of humanity being a threat because the Battle at Procyon V failed and the attempted invasion was thwarted.
The Sphere Builders realized that the Federation was too powerful and realized they would need to prevent it from ever existing and by studying the timelines they realized Earth was key in its formation. So they chose a moment where Earth had very little in the way of alliances and picked the Xindi who were the perfect targets to do their bidding.
Because of the time ripple delay Daniels referred to in "Carpenter Street", Daniels was able to take Archer to this unaltered event despite the earlier changes that would erase it. So yes the Battle at Procyon V in the 26th century was part of Daniels past. This battle is what caused the Sphere Builders to contact the Xindi and their interference in the 22nd century created a lot of changes in Daniels' original timeline.
Tighs Eye said:
I think it did. Daniels said that TCW was ending AND given the temporal prime directive, it would make sense that Daniels would limit Archer to as little information as necessary/possibleKalen Archer said:
I don't think Storm Front wrapped it up adequately
No, no, no. If that were the case and we were being shown a timeline where Archer failed then there would have been no Federation fleet including the Ent-J combatting them since Earth would have been long destroyed by the Xindi 400 years earlier and no Federation. We were being shown the Battle at Procyon V in order to understand why the Sphere Builders were manipulating the Xindi into destroying Earth and all of humanity. We are seeing the original history as it were where there had been no attack on Earth, humanity and the Xindi weren't enemies and Archer hadn't brought down the sphere network.saul said:
But in the26th Century Daniels shows Archer a timeline that follows if Archer failed. The Spheres which created the expanse should not be there. The expanse we see in the 26th century is a result of it expanding from the 22nd. So this is not a past of Daniels because without the Spheres tyhere is no expanse.startrekwatcher said:
Daniels comment about "None of this is suppose to be happening" in "Carpenter Street was referring to the brutal attack on Earth by the Xindi and the hostility between the two species. And he was right.saul said:
Actually there is no proof of that what so ever. Daniels said that those events aren't suppoed to happen.startrekwatcher said:
Daniels showed Archer the Battle of Procyon V in the 26th century. Daniels might not be from the 26th century but that conflict was in fact part of his history that led to his time period.saul said:He was from the 31st Century. The events he showed Archer were in the 26th.
If the Sphere Builders hadn't told the Xindi Earth was a threat then Earth wouldn't have been attacked in 2153, 7 million wouldn't have died, Archer's mission wouldn't have taken him to the Expanse this early, the NX wouldn't have been in the Expanse for a year, the Andorians wouldn't have gotten the Xindi prototype etc etc.
Daniels took Archer to the 26th century to show him the Battle at Procyon V in order to let him understand in more detail why someone from the future had pitted Earth and the Xindi against one another in the 22nd century. And as we heard in "Azati Prime", the Sphere Builders lied to the Xindi of humanity being a threat because the Battle at Procyon V failed and the attempted invasion was thwarted.
The Sphere Builders realized that the Federation was too powerful and realized they would need to prevent it from ever existing and by studying the timelines they realized Earth was key in its formation. So they chose a moment where Earth had very little in the way of alliances and picked the Xindi who were the perfect targets to do their bidding.
Because of the time ripple delay Daniels referred to in "Carpenter Street", Daniels was able to take Archer to this unaltered event despite the earlier changes that would erase it. So yes the Battle at Procyon V in the 26th century was part of Daniels past. This battle is what caused the Sphere Builders to contact the Xindi and their interference in the 22nd century created a lot of changes in Daniels' original timeline.
That would've been preferable.Guy Gardener said:
Toni Braxton?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.