Was there really any need to destroy Enterprise-D?
Yes, because the script necessitated the ship to blow up and the saucer section to crash on the planet.
Now with that said, the biggest flaw (of many) of Generations is that Picard could have chosen to go back in time to at least before the ship was destroyed, and deal with Soran then. That way we still could have seen the crash, but it would then have gotten a reset button and never happened. But instead Picard chooses the dumbest point in time to return. Granted he wasn’t aware of the Enterprise’s destruction, but so what. The ship stayed destroyed because they just wanted another one.
One, It shouldn't have been destoryed, as said before, Not a big fan of the Ent E.. Atleast it wasn't destroyed like the Kelvin enterprise.. that was just.. bad writing.. and sad.
Yes, because the script necessitated the ship to blow up and the saucer section to crash on the planet.
I don't mind the way it was destroyed at all. The saucer separation was greatly underutilized throughout the series, and a crash like that wasn't done before in Trek that I recall. Obviously there is no reason why it had to happen that way, but you can say that about practically anything that happens in fiction.But was it really absolutely necessary for the saucer to land on the planet? I think it's a bad script if it involves destroying Enterprise-D. And even if it didn't, it's still bad....
Some have mentioned the timing Picard chose after he left the nexus. He chose to confront Soran. Some might wonder why not go further back in time before anything went wrong? Why not go 50 years back and relive your life? Assuming it was possible to choose the timing, the movie wasn't exactly specific on how nexus works.
I wouldn't say terrible, but it's definitely disjointed. It would have worked better if they had just kept it totally a TNG film and not added Kirk, et al. in it.Lets face it, it's a horrible movie.I don't remember the last time when I watched it and I plan to stay away from it, possibly for the rest of my life, it's that bad.
Changing the Generations story only a little so that the sisters have three ships would have probably been the simplest and best way to make the loss feel not so forced and underwhelming. Although Picard and the crew just underestimating the one ship is fairly disappointing but not a really bad development, interesting in a way.
IIRC
The season 1 model was later replaced with a bigger model of the ship.Was it around season 3?
Correct me if I'm wrong here.
Wouldn't it be an issue during these times when we see the ship in a region with gravitational shears, or close to something with extreme gravity?In space you don't need balance![]()
Yes, because the script necessitated the ship to blow up and the saucer section to crash on the planet.
Now with that said, the biggest flaw (of many) of Generations is that Picard could have chosen to go back in time to at least before the ship was destroyed, and deal with Soran then. That way we still could have seen the crash, but it would then have gotten a reset button and never happened. But instead Picard chooses the dumbest point in time to return. Granted he wasn’t aware of the Enterprise’s destruction, but so what. The ship stayed destroyed because they just wanted another one.
The biggest flaw is why Soren needed to come up with with hair brained plan at all.
"Why can't he just fly into it with a ship?"
See bullshit excuse why they can't fly j to it with a ship
Meanwhile, I'm the same movie, two examples of flying into it with a ship working perfectly fine (the transports, with Soren feeling ripped away, and Enterprise B, with Kirk)
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.