Yes you can still enjoy LOST "in pieces" but as a whole it is an utter failure.




Apparently the reports detailing the demise of hyperbole on the internet were, themselves, hyperbolic.
Yes you can still enjoy LOST "in pieces" but as a whole it is an utter failure.
Like Clarke's "Exile Of The Eons." That would have been a good way to go.Okay, here's an idea (I'm not saying it's a good idea): what if they hit the idea harder that MiB was an alien criminal who had been exiled to Earth, because Earth has "ley lines" and other hooey that can be used by the aliens to create an ideal prison for a prisoner who, because of the nature of the aliens, is very hard to keep ahold of?
We don't need to see the aliens, their ships, or anything along those lines. Just imply this more strongly, that we get the idea that the whole thing has an extraterrestrial, but essentially rational, origin. Leave the mysteries plotline in the sci fi "real world," and save the mysticism and religion for the characters plotline.
Honestly, I think I like this idea better than the ending we got.
I agree, although I would prefer humans from the future exiling a prisoner, perhaps guilty of no more than thought crimes, to Earth's distant past.
I agree. That would have worked perfectly.I couldn't possibly claim to have written anything better than what was written. However, the ending I was expecting was Jack fighting Locke, but doing so in a way that allowed everyone else to escape. Then it cuts to Jack and Locke on the beach playing backgammon and bickering like Jacob and the Man in Black. Essentially, have everything go full circle, but not really resolve the island in any way.
Best answer I have heard.![]()
I wasn't referring to it as a failure as a business venture or as a piece of entertainment but was referring to it failing at its attempt to tell a coherent long-term narrative. It was far too disjointed with too little payoff on so many of its threads that I can't look at it as anything else. It takes very little energy to come up with teaser and piling them up the real talent comes when actually doing something with them in a substantive way and providing a satisfying pay-off or resolution. So many are just left there dangling with not much to make of them except a gimmick by the writers to toy with the audience.Am I saying that it is an "utter" success? No. But to say that it is an "utter" (defined as "complete; total; absolute; unqualified; unconditional") failure? Surely not. Unless one is being "utterly" hyperbolic.![]()
The Shield.Same problem as Lost - trying to create a huge, multi-season storyline that juggles the plotlines of a large number of characters, do it all on the fly under the merciless gaze of network (or even cable) ratings needs, and then tie it all up with a nice bow at the end.What is it these days with good series all having crappy endings?
I'm looking at you BSG.
To turn it around, name a serialized series that has run for four or more years and does have a good ending. I can't think of one.
Babylon 5The Shield.Same problem as Lost - trying to create a huge, multi-season storyline that juggles the plotlines of a large number of characters, do it all on the fly under the merciless gaze of network (or even cable) ratings needs, and then tie it all up with a nice bow at the end.
To turn it around, name a serialized series that has run for four or more years and does have a good ending. I can't think of one.
Yes. The Shield had possibly the best ending in TV history of any show not named "Newhart."
I also enjoyed the endings to Six Feet Under and even the Sopranos.
To hear the series creator tell it, the entire six-year macro story of Carnivàle was mapped out from the start, which (as has been mentioned above) was not the case with Lost. Granted, the show only had the chance to do a third of that story, so the overall cohesion potential remains unknowabale, but while the series certainly evolved in some respects (no one thought the Dreifuss family would become as prominent as it did), it certainly remained almost entirely coherent 'til the end.There will be the isolated character moments here and there and the mysterious aura to be had it just cheats by not wrapping up all these threads they introduce. That's why I have really become soured on these massive mythology shows--none of them can juggle it. It is fine to be epic and big and complex but ultimately if you can't keep it all in check then why bother--it is just the latest fad as far as I am concerned ushered in by Lost. Call me old fashion but I'd much prefer a show that introduces a manageablr number of storylines, then actually *develop* them rather than treating them as nothing more as teasers, plot points or aborted storylines and finally provide a satisfying payoff. These days shows just want to cram as much as they can into themselves without doing them justice. Quality over quantity I say.
^ The West Wing finished pretty well (though not quite wonderfully), also.
Yep, that actually happened.nukeing the island after some of the main cast got off the island.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.