I would definitely want it replaced with a Trek series I can get behind. But, if my only choices are STD or no Trek, I would choose no Trek.Would you replace it, or be content without a series?
I would definitely want it replaced with a Trek series I can get behind. But, if my only choices are STD or no Trek, I would choose no Trek.Would you replace it, or be content without a series?
No, not really.What would be great is if we experienced some type of leap backwards in time where STD was never even created (zero seasons).
What would be great is if we experienced some type of leap backwards in time where STD was never even created (zero seasons).
Absolutely.So, wait, are you talking some sort of time travel episode where they go back in time and prevent that time travel episode from ever happening?
I would prefer they try and fail than not try at all.There is enough hours of Trek, that IMO, we do not need more Trek at any price.
There is enough hours of Trek, that IMO, we do not need more Trek at any price.
I would prefer they try and fail than not try at all.
Actually, this was true long before Star Trek ever even existed."Enough football has been played in our lifetimes where we really don't need any further seasons or games."
![]()
1. No idea how this is relevant.Actually, this was true long before Star Trek ever even existed.
^^^What would be great is if we experienced some type of leap backwards in time where ST:VOY was never even created (zero seasons).
I'll take that deal too. I only need TOS, TNG, DS9, and Enterprise.^^^
FTFY![]()
I would definitely want it replaced with a Trek series I can get behind. But, if my only choices are STD or no Trek, I would choose no Trek.
Then how does DISCO affect these view habits again?I'll take that deal too. I only need TOS, TNG, DS9, and Enterprise.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.