My bad. I meant 11 ft., not 14.
My bad. I meant 11 ft., not 14.
IIRC, 134" - 11' 2"My bad. I meant 11 ft., not 14.
286m or 288.6m? I just need to be sureI obviously don't know every version of every TOS Enterprise realized in 3D but I think Vektor set a lot of baselines that have been echoed in lots of other "modern" takes on the TOS ship. It was a significant effort in a well trafficked community at the time.
I know for myself I STILL find myself finding other things to do so that I don't copy Vektor. His TOS drydock is genius.
Oh, and it's a 286m long ship.
286m or 288.6m? I just need to be sure
According to the guy who built it, it's not. It was built at a scale of 1" = 1' from a drawing using a scale of 1/8" = 1':I know the shuttle deck model is (almost certainly) distorted front to back, sure.
I keep asking that question too. I'd take it on but it would require mastering Blender's clunky interface, which I find counterintuitive to me in the extreme.Has anyone ever scaled the Enterprise based on the only thing that we ever saw next to a real person: The shuttle and the shuttle deck?
Has anyone ever scaled the Enterprise based on the only thing that we ever saw next to a real person: The shuttle and the shuttle deck?
I know the shuttle deck model is (almost certainly) distorted front to back, sure.
But top to bottom it has to be in scale with the shuttle. So that tells you how tall the doors are. And I don't care if you use the scale of the full size prop or the stated size of the shuttle in dialog. (I'd be curious to do both just to see what different sizes we'd get.) I'm more leery about using the interior shuttle set, but I'd have to accept it if someone did.
I would imagine we'd get a much bigger ship. I don't know if we'd get a SNW ship. (Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe it would be bigger. Wouldn't that be a kick in the head?)
The biggest reason that I don't take it seriously when people say "The ship HAS to be bigger to realistically fit what we saw on screen" is because SNW went and made the ship bigger... and then went and made the SETS bigger too! So maybe the SNW Enterprise could more comfortably fit the TOS sets. But I'm almost certain that it couldn't fit the SNW sets! (That SNW shuttle deck seems ALMOST as big as TAS!)
The biggest difference is that in SNW we have a reverse shot looking into the shuttlebay interior from the exterior. So we know how the SNW shuttlebay scales with the SNW Enterprise and more importantly that it fits. We don't have that for TOS Original FX.
First off, thanks @blssdwlf and @BK613.
I'm going from memory on a wonderfully relaxed day where I'm not looking anything up, but I seem to recall most of the hangars that I have seen that "fit" that the shuttle comes at LEAST to the bottom of the observation structures if not a little higher. But on screen the shuttle is quite a bit shorter.
My opinion is that (except for SNW and JJ09) none of the shuttle decks we have seen have the same sense of size that the show did.
Well, it fits what we see, sure. But does it fit given the dimensions new or otherwise that we are given for the ship?
I'm totally eyeballing / guessing but I know that their shuttlecraft are really big and that's a very spacious hangar. So how big does that make the ship?
First off, thanks @blssdwlf and @BK613.
I'm going from memory on a wonderfully relaxed day where I'm not looking anything up, but I seem to recall most of the hangars that I have seen that "fit" that the shuttle comes at LEAST to the bottom of the observation structures if not a little higher. But on screen the shuttle is quite a bit shorter.
My opinion is that (except for SNW and JJ09) none of the shuttle decks we have seen have the same sense of size that the show did.
Well, it fits what we see, sure. But does it fit given the dimensions new or otherwise that we are given for the ship?
I'm totally eyeballing / guessing but I know that their shuttlecraft are really big and that's a very spacious hangar. So how big does that make the ship?
That puts it in the neighborhood of the JJ ship and larger than the Galaxy class, yes?
I would argue not because this was before anything was firmly established. By the time the show went to series and began being aired the larger size was already established.It certainly establishes that there is precedent for upscaling the Enterprise, should those in power feel there is a need. It's happened at least 3 times now, with the TOS Enterprise, the SNW Enterprise and the JJPrise.
Well, VOY's S5 episode "Extreme Risk" showed the design and construction of the Delta Flyer, and it was rebuilt at the start of S7 (lost in the S6 finale). This solves the riddle of Voyager's endless shuttles - they rebuild them when lost. Now, here's the real question. Presumably, Voyager has at least 2 of those small speedboat-looking shuttles, 2 of the boxy shuttles, the Delta Flyer, and Neelix's shuttle - the Baxial. Whenever we see the inside of the shuttlebay, it's always empty or just one shuttle. Where did they all go?It's following the noble Star Trek tradition. The TMP Enterprise would need to be a mile long to fit that cargo complex in. So would Voyager to fit all those shuttles!
When I made my 3D model of the TOS shuttlecraft I came up with a 27ft and change exterior because I tightened up the interior cabin a bit. Interestingly, and by accident. the length of the exterior without the nacelles or rear landing strut was about 24ft.When Polar Lights designed their TOS shuttlecraft model kit, Gary Kerr did a lot of figuring on how to get the interior set into a viable exterior, and he came up with, IIRC, a 29-foot vehicle. That's not too much larger than Kirk's 24' quote. And in my head-canon, Kirk was thinking of the interior cabin space when he sad 24'.