I see we have moved to the third stage
How about William Shatner for a voice over?
- Thread starter Savoy 1984
- Start date
If it's not Star Trek without "the Shat", then how do you account for those hundreds of hours of Star Trek that I've enjoyed that don't have Shatner in it?
It's all crap! *
* Except for when Neelix's cheese jammed up the warp drive; when Janeway and Paris went past Warp 10 and turned into lizards; when Reed peed in his pants; and when Archer's dog pissed on a tree, causing an interplanetary incident.
If it's not Star Trek without "the Shat", then how do you account for those hundreds of hours of Star Trek that I've enjoyed that don't have Shatner in it?
It's all crap! *
* Except for when Neelix's cheese jammed up the warp drive; when Janeway and Paris went past Warp 10 and turned into lizards; when Reed peed in his pants; and when Archer's dog pissed on a tree, causing an interplanetary incident.
Right, excellent points, Sam! Of course, I'm sure you'll agree there's NO WAY those astounding moments of Modern Trek come close to approaching the amazing adventures of space hippies grooving in the break room, Spock being lobotomized and controlled by a remote, and evil menacing witch puppets! Oh and not to forget the thrilling adventure of the dueling Lazaruses (or is plural of the name Lazarus Lazarii? ).
Of course, I'm sure you'll agree there's NO WAY those astounding moments of Modern Trek come close to approaching the amazing adventures of space hippies grooving in the break room, Spock being lobotomized and controlled by a remote, and evil menacing witch puppets! Oh and not to forget the thrilling adventure of the dueling Lazaruses (or is plural of the name Lazarus Lazarii?
Pure gold!
And "Starring William Shatner," no less.
Coincidence?
I think not.
Don't make me add another groundhog. They're gettin' carpal tunnel in their stumpy little arms from waving.
i feel for you but what did you people think of my plot or device to get shatner in the film?
remember he does not need to do any action scenes,just sit at a huge table sourrounded by heavy weight starfleet personnel waiting for him to lead...waiting for him to command...waiting for him say the word.
the word is:-
"Execute"
"No-Fee doesn't like it when I do cameos. It upsets him."
I can't wait for folks to get to the last stage of grief.
This is getting silly seeing this pop-up at least once a week.
William Shatner : I'M NOT IN THE NEW STAR TREK MOVIE !
I don't think he was lying to the reporters when he said that.
Unless you think he's getting forgetful in his old age or it's a joke.
Personnaly I think he's getting tired of being asked if he's in it.
- W -
* Are we to the last stage of grief yet ? *
This is getting silly seeing this pop-up at least once a week.
William Shatner : I'M NOT IN THE NEW STAR TREK MOVIE !
I don't think he was lying to the reporters when he said that.
Unless you think he's getting forgetful in his old age or it's a joke.
Personnaly I think he's getting tired of being asked if he's in it.
- W -
* Are we to the last stage of grief yet ? *
Why wouldn't they use Pine instead? Having Shatner do it makes no sense at all when there is another actor already playing Kirk. None at all.
Amen! Shatner did some nice work BACK IN THE DAY! He's done with Trek and if he wasn't ready to quit it, he never should've agreed to kill off Kirk in GEN. If you need to blame anyone for the death of Kirk, go straight to Big Bill!
If it's not Star Trek without "the Shat", then how do you account for those hundreds of hours of Star Trek that I've enjoyed that don't have Shatner in it?
But maybe that was a marketing strategy.
Imagine the waves if he was found to be in the film.
Tons of free publicity.
How true. Pathetic really. If by some miracle, The Shat appeared in this film, it would automatically lose 4 out of a possible 5 stars on my rating scale. That would mean it would have to be Oscar-bait for it to even be considered poor. I'm hoping for a 4 star movie and if that happens, it plummets down to zero making it unwatchable by any standard.
Why? You got money riding on this one?
Nearly spit my Earl Grey all over the keyboard.Oh and not to forget the thrilling adventure of the dueling Lazaruses (or is plural of the name Lazarus Lazarii?
Sharr
Lazaræ.Nearly spit my Earl Grey all over the keyboard.Oh and not to forget the thrilling adventure of the dueling Lazaruses (or is plural of the name Lazarus Lazarii?
Not the voice of the computer, as the voice of Kirk. Pine's voice should be dubbed over with Shatner's like Chris Reeve did with Jeff East in Superman I. That would be cool.
If it's not Star Trek without "the Shat", then how do you account for those hundreds of hours of Star Trek that I've enjoyed that don't have Shatner in it?
Ok, let me rephrase it - it's not TOS without the Shat; and STXI will be a TOS-based film with old Spock/Nimoy and ALL TOS characters in it - so, it won't be TOS without old Kirk/Shatner.
Similar threads
