I've reported on heroes4evr since it looks like that account hasn't been banned yet. Sigh. Give it up, will you??
So, this thread has been pretty interesting. I have to say I take issue with the notion that people don't want serialized storytelling. I absolutely want that! Heroes' failure was, as articulated by so many others, its horrible writing after the first season. Season two got off to a decent start as far as I'm concerned, but it wasn't long before we started to see the cracks forming in the show's facade: Peter's Irish girlfriend got lost in time, never to be heard from again (real classy, man!); everyone figured out that Kensei was Adam Munroe and the guy who killed Hiro's father, what, five or six episodes before it was revealed?; plotlines meandered and went nowhere. The show just became a trainwreck. It also relied way too much on a handful of conventions:
* Visions of the future, so our heroes know what sort of awful peril they must thwart.
* At least one flashback and one flash-forward episode per volume.
* Lies and retcons all over the place, so the plot never ends up making any sense when taken as a whole.
For me, character stagnation is what killed this show. BSG was never a well-plotted series, but its characters grew and changed, their relationships evolved, and they absolutely were not the same people by the end of the series. It was compelling viewing to watch them transform over four seasons. Heroes, on the other hand... did any of these characters change substantially over four seasons? Let's see:
* Peter was still a lost puppy looking for family approval, despite flirtations with making a difference on his own.
* Mohinder, though he gained super strength at one point, always remained a wide-eyed idiot who never grasped the consequences of anything he did, and got constantly manipulated by bad guys (and everyone else, for that matter.)
* Sylar... well, his motivations changed a few times a season, but he still remained a psycho killer at heart, wanting to be the most special of all the specials.
* Claire never stopped rebelling against her father, even though he was always right in the end. Grow up, kid.
* Nathan started off strong, but became a perpetual fuckup and eventually died for it. Too bad the writers couldn't leave well enough alone, having to give him this ridiculous Nathan == Sylar "arc."
* Matt had some semblance of character evolution when he lost his wife and son, at least until they whitewashed all that, got him back with his wife, and made the son his after all.
* Noah was probably as close as we got to a truly dynamic character. Even so, he was defined almost entirely by two traits: love for his daughter, and paranoia over the dangers of the specials. Those traits never changed over the course of the series.
* By this point I'm too bored to even think about Nikki/Jessica/whatever thankless role Ali Larter has been shoehorned into this year.
This was a show with immense potential, a well-done first season, and they threw it all away. One of the greatest disappointments in all my TV viewing experiences.
So, this thread has been pretty interesting. I have to say I take issue with the notion that people don't want serialized storytelling. I absolutely want that! Heroes' failure was, as articulated by so many others, its horrible writing after the first season. Season two got off to a decent start as far as I'm concerned, but it wasn't long before we started to see the cracks forming in the show's facade: Peter's Irish girlfriend got lost in time, never to be heard from again (real classy, man!); everyone figured out that Kensei was Adam Munroe and the guy who killed Hiro's father, what, five or six episodes before it was revealed?; plotlines meandered and went nowhere. The show just became a trainwreck. It also relied way too much on a handful of conventions:
* Visions of the future, so our heroes know what sort of awful peril they must thwart.
* At least one flashback and one flash-forward episode per volume.
* Lies and retcons all over the place, so the plot never ends up making any sense when taken as a whole.
For me, character stagnation is what killed this show. BSG was never a well-plotted series, but its characters grew and changed, their relationships evolved, and they absolutely were not the same people by the end of the series. It was compelling viewing to watch them transform over four seasons. Heroes, on the other hand... did any of these characters change substantially over four seasons? Let's see:
* Peter was still a lost puppy looking for family approval, despite flirtations with making a difference on his own.
* Mohinder, though he gained super strength at one point, always remained a wide-eyed idiot who never grasped the consequences of anything he did, and got constantly manipulated by bad guys (and everyone else, for that matter.)
* Sylar... well, his motivations changed a few times a season, but he still remained a psycho killer at heart, wanting to be the most special of all the specials.
* Claire never stopped rebelling against her father, even though he was always right in the end. Grow up, kid.
* Nathan started off strong, but became a perpetual fuckup and eventually died for it. Too bad the writers couldn't leave well enough alone, having to give him this ridiculous Nathan == Sylar "arc."
* Matt had some semblance of character evolution when he lost his wife and son, at least until they whitewashed all that, got him back with his wife, and made the son his after all.

* Noah was probably as close as we got to a truly dynamic character. Even so, he was defined almost entirely by two traits: love for his daughter, and paranoia over the dangers of the specials. Those traits never changed over the course of the series.
* By this point I'm too bored to even think about Nikki/Jessica/whatever thankless role Ali Larter has been shoehorned into this year.
This was a show with immense potential, a well-done first season, and they threw it all away. One of the greatest disappointments in all my TV viewing experiences.