North Pole-aris said:
Where the hell have you been, Brutal?
Jus' chillin'.
North Pole-aris said:
Where the hell have you been, Brutal?
Lumen said:
What if there are helmets? Is that still a hat?
Anything set during the TOS years should match, but there's room to show something that seems a logical progression in the earlier years. How logical and believable that is is what some people will react strongly to.Dar70 said:
Basil said:
Why do a prequel otherwise?Dar70 said:
WHY are so many concerned about the look of the film?![]()
They are NOT going to make it look like the 60's series. If anything it will look closer to ST: Enterprise. A show that I felt got its visuals right. Even when they did IAMD they made subtle changes to the Defiant interiors that made it look a little more texture. Im starting to think there is a group of fans out there that will except nothing less than a show or movie exactly modeled after TOS.
For the story. Visuals should be the least concern. It doesnt have to match perfectly with TOS. Im not saying it shouldnt have some style connections to TOS. It just doesnt have to be exact. The fact that people are spazzing out over hats is a little extreme IMO.![]()
"Assignment: Earth" -- the Launch Control Room23skidoo said:
DrunkenSanta said:
Spock looks good in a hat.
![]()
Maybe, but Kirk looks like he's been hitting the donuts. (I don't even recognize the episode - what's that from?
Sharr Khan said:
I'm disturbed the third choice is running neck & neck with "No", that says alot about Star Trek fans... nothing great either.
Sharr
Brutal Strudel said:
Judges?
I'm sorry, the judges have ruled. We must continue the histrionics.
Next category: should canon be ignored. First question: should the Gorn be reimagined as the Geico Gecko?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.