Why the hell is everyone still talking about "replacing all of their dvds?!?!?" Your dvds still work. You can buy NEW releases on BD and upgrade the ones you feel are worth upgrading. My season 1 of Malcolm in the Middle... guess what? Not being upgraded. Band of Brothers on the other hand, probably will. Trading places: great movie... won't get it in HD... Transformers... I bought it in HD right away![]()
That's what I've been trying to say a couple pages ago.
That's exactly what I am doing.
My DVD collections dwarfes my BD collection (if you can even call it that at this point) and it will for a long time to come. But cherry-picking the movies I'd like to have in HD is certainly the way to go.
My feeling - based on nothing more than my gut - is Blu-ray will catch on. But it will be a slow process, far slower than DVD market penetration.
I wonder if part of Blu-Ray's slow start is that people don't realize how good it looks:
I wonder if part of Blu-Ray's slow start is that people don't realize how good it looks:
I think the point is - most people don't care or don't seem to notice.
I wonder if part of Blu-Ray's slow start is that people don't realize how good it looks: not waay better than DVD, but pretty fucking amazing when it is set up properly. I wasn't totally sold on Blu-Ray at first, and wonder if that's because my only real exposure to 1080p was at the Futureshops and Bestbuys when I could only watch for 15 seconds before I was harassed by a salesman. I have seen HD feeds on hockey and football games at bars, but not the same setting as in my home.
Now that I have my rumpus room in my basement turned into a quasi-home theater, I have to say that I love it. Love it. My set up looks amazing. I sit about 5 feet away from my 52" and it is better than going to the theater.
I have several hundred DVDs, and I have no plans to replace any of them, because the difference in quality isn't that great, but the difference in quality is enough that I will buy future movies on BD.
Considering the majority of the country is made up of Wal Mart and K-Mart shoppers -- the low income bracket and the welfare families of certain economically disadvantaged racial groups -- I don't see those people forking over their pennies for Blu-ray players and Blu-ray discs when they can snap up DVD on the cheap when they are always looking for sales on food items and discount products.My feeling - based on nothing more than my gut - is Blu-ray will catch on. But it will be a slow process, far slower than DVD market penetration.
Agreed. You have every major studio on board--no more fighting with HD DVD. You have just about every new release coming to BD. You have classic movie now on the format--Casablanca, The Searchers, Wizard of Oz next year. Retail is devoting more shelf space to the product. We have the digital TV transition happening next year.
It's not a sprint, it's a marathon. The more people see HD content, the more they'll be inclined to research and get the equipment. Maybe piecemeal, but they will get it. But not as fast as the naysayers expect.
^It doesn't help HD as a whole when stores set up their displays showing analogue TV broadcasts over a shared RF lead from a weak portable aerial, stretched out from 4:3 to 16:9 so everyone looks fat.
^It doesn't help HD as a whole when stores set up their displays showing analogue TV broadcasts over a shared RF lead from a weak portable aerial, stretched out from 4:3 to 16:9 so everyone looks fat.
If we break down the demographic, the customers who are inclined to purchase Blu-ray players and Blu-ray discs currently are most likely college degree holders and/or higher than average income earners, and "we" are not the "average joe customers."
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.