Teelie Sorry if it sounded like I was disagreeing with you. I was actually agreeing with you in a roundabout way. That's why I started my post with "by the numbers" However I could have done a better job clarifying myself. No matter what technology comes around the bend the biggest leap in quality (perception wise) will always be VHS to DVD simply because of the jump from analog to digital. (until the leap to Holo TV or some other game changing format). When I mentioned that people sit too far away from their TV's it was an acknowledgement of the diminishing returns involved with higher resolutions.
RoJoHen I wasn't thinking practical. I was just answering the question technology wise. I agree that what they have proposed for a future TV format is just overboard. However I would love that 22.2 surround system. Speakers on the ceiling all around you, speakers at ear level surrounding you and speakers below you. That is surround sound in a literal sense.
RoJoHen I wasn't thinking practical. I was just answering the question technology wise. I agree that what they have proposed for a future TV format is just overboard. However I would love that 22.2 surround system. Speakers on the ceiling all around you, speakers at ear level surrounding you and speakers below you. That is surround sound in a literal sense.
). I care about these games, and so do a fair amount of other people, but I doubt they're popular enough - except maybe for the most recent World Series - for Big Media to bother streaming them on demand.
There are some standard def DVDs I have, such as the IMAX Everest film, that I would love to have on BR, because the standard version is of rather poor quality. But even if the DVD is good, the BR will always be better to me.

