• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Has Blu-Ray failed?

Anyways I would suggest you actually try out a DVD player before you start bitching about how they suck just because you don't have the money to buy one or are not smart enough to use it.
:lol:
 
At least the DVD format worked out of the box. Blu-Ray was DOA between all the different firmware versions, requiring manual upgrades via thumbdrives and such. The only real gripe I had with DVD's was that stupid region encoding crap. Of course, Blu-Ray has its own flavor of that, too.
 
At least the DVD format worked out of the box. Blu-Ray was DOA between all the different firmware versions, requiring manual upgrades via thumbdrives and such.

I'm an early adopter of new tech, so much so that it drives the Misses nuts. I've had far less issues with early Blu-ray than early DVD players.

There were tons of early DVD discs that were problematic due to there not being a uniform authoring techniques early on (something Blu-ray learned from).

It just seems some people have an axe to grind with Sony. :guffaw:
 
Last edited:
Blu-Ray was DOA

DOA? :wtf:

Blu-ray Sells over $330m in Q1 2010
Share
3
Posted April 5, 2010 05:15 AM by Juan Calonge

According to aggregate weekly estimates from the research department of Home Media Magazine and listed each week on blu-ray.com's sales information posts, revenues from BD sales in the US in the first quarter of 2010 were $331.31 million, 68.5% more than in the same period of 2009. Blu-ray accounted for 12.3% of packaged-media sales revenue in the first three months of the year (versus 7.0% in Jan-Mar 2009).

Packaged-media sales revenues for the quarter were just short of $2.7 billion, 3.1% up year-on-year.

The biggest-selling week in the quarter was the week ended March 25, with $45.46 million in BD sales. The slowest week was the week ended February 21, with $18.58 million.

During the month of March, Blu-ray sales revenues were $130.36 million, 86% up year-on-year.
 
They have Blu-ray discs at my supermarket checkout now. I picked up Toy Story 3 last week while buying groceries. :techman:
 
Odd as how today I came across an article entitield

Is Blu-ray Finally Hitting Its Stride?
Posted 12/17/10

worldwide pre-recorded Blu-ray disc production has set a pace to exceed 400 million units by the end of 2010, representing a healthy 60 percent jump from 2009.

It is certainly growing but the main question is will downloadable HD content or streaming HD content take over faster from DVDs?
 
Well, Blu-Rays are becoming more and more affordable (even cheap in some cases), so it doesn't surprise me that they're taking off.

As for streaming, I dunno. I think you'll always run into the problem of reliability. While I love my Netflix Instant Streaming and use it quite often, sometimes it just doesn't work, either because of a problem on Netflix's end or because of my own internet connection.
 
I've never understood the charge by some that there is only a small difference in quality between DVD and Blu-Ray. The difference is HUGE. Compare "The Godfather Trilogy" the james bond movies or even the recent Harry Potter movies to their DVD counterparts and then come back and tell me that you didn't notice a difference.

Blu-Ray hasn't failed. The fact that you don't have to throw away and rebuy your movie library like you did from VHS to DVD is a great advantage. Plus the price for players and movies are exactly where DVD was only a few years ago.

I don't want to go the download route because I like having that copy which can't be erased.
 
My local Kroger (a grocery store) has an LG 1080p Blu-Ray player for $79.99. Prices are dropping fast.
 
I've never understood the charge by some that there is only a small difference in quality between DVD and Blu-Ray. The difference is HUGE. Compare "The Godfather Trilogy" the james bond movies or even the recent Harry Potter movies to their DVD counterparts and then come back and tell me that you didn't notice a difference.

Absolutely. VHS to DVD was very obvious. The audio and video quality was vastly improved, and the reliability of the medium was far better than cassettes. That said, I remember the first Blu-ray movie I watched. I felt like I could almost reach through the screen and touch the objects in the image. DVD didn't even come close in that regard.

Blu-Ray hasn't failed. The fact that you don't have to throw away and rebuy your movie library like you did from VHS to DVD is a great advantage. Plus the price for players and movies are exactly where DVD was only a few years ago.
Amen to that! At one time, I had a huge DVD collection, and once I got a Blu-ray player, I knew I could buy Blu-ray movies at my convenience, as the DVD titles weren't going anywhere.

I don't want to go the download route because I like having that copy which can't be erased.
This is the one reason I don't fully embrace instant download. I love the concept, love the convenience, but I like actually owning the media. A hard copy is still preferable for now.
 
This may make me sound like a stubborn old ass but damn it, I don't need crystal clear picture perfect HD to enjoy shows or movies. DVD offers satisfactory picture quality for me to enjoy a production.

Besides, the "like you're there" feeling blu-ray offers isn't necessarily an improvement. Sometimes, it feels exactly like I'm on a soundstage watching this thing being filmed, and that's not something I want to experience while watching a show/movie.
 
We'll get off your lawn now.

;)

I don't care, though. I just want my physical media. I'll never adopt download-able movies/shows. I want my own copy of it I can stick in and play at any time and can hold onto to "know" I own it and not have to rely on a cash flow, a media server or a special device connected to the internet to get to my collection. I want a tangible copy I can grab at any time, look at and know I have it and show it off.

I love showing off my DVD colelction what would I do if it was all download-able content? "Hey! Dude! I've got a great movie and TV collection check out my queue! Oh, damn the server's going under maintenance, can't get to it!"
 
I love showing off my DVD colelction what would I do if it was all download-able content? "Hey! Dude! I've got a great movie and TV collection check out my queue! Oh, damn the server's going under maintenance, can't get to it!"
:lol:
I agree. I would much rather own the physical disk than have a license to view a movie.
 
This may make me sound like a stubborn old ass but damn it, I don't need crystal clear picture perfect HD to enjoy shows or movies. DVD offers satisfactory picture quality for me to enjoy a production.

Besides, the "like you're there" feeling blu-ray offers isn't necessarily an improvement. Sometimes, it feels exactly like I'm on a soundstage watching this thing being filmed, and that's not something I want to experience while watching a show/movie.

That's fine. I like crystal clear HD movies, which means for me, Blu-ray is terrific. That said, most of my favorite movies come from the 40s, 50s and 60s. I have them on DVD. Played on my Blu-ray player, the colors pop better, the image looks better, and they don't have to look crystal clear for me to enjoy them, but they do show improvement. So for me, Blu-ray is win/win.
 
I don't need crystal clear pictures either, but I've got an HDTV and a PS3, which happens to be a Blu-Ray player, so I figure I might as well take advantage of it.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top