Anyways I would suggest you actually try out a DVD player before you start bitching about how they suck just because you don't have the money to buy one or are not smart enough to use it.

Anyways I would suggest you actually try out a DVD player before you start bitching about how they suck just because you don't have the money to buy one or are not smart enough to use it.
I'm wondering... have people also bitched so much about DVDs when they replaced VHS, LDs and CDs?
At least the DVD format worked out of the box. Blu-Ray was DOA between all the different firmware versions, requiring manual upgrades via thumbdrives and such.
At least the DVD format worked out of the box.
Blu-Ray was DOA
Blu-ray Sells over $330m in Q1 2010
Share
3
Posted April 5, 2010 05:15 AM by Juan Calonge
According to aggregate weekly estimates from the research department of Home Media Magazine and listed each week on blu-ray.com's sales information posts, revenues from BD sales in the US in the first quarter of 2010 were $331.31 million, 68.5% more than in the same period of 2009. Blu-ray accounted for 12.3% of packaged-media sales revenue in the first three months of the year (versus 7.0% in Jan-Mar 2009).
Packaged-media sales revenues for the quarter were just short of $2.7 billion, 3.1% up year-on-year.
The biggest-selling week in the quarter was the week ended March 25, with $45.46 million in BD sales. The slowest week was the week ended February 21, with $18.58 million.
During the month of March, Blu-ray sales revenues were $130.36 million, 86% up year-on-year.
worldwide pre-recorded Blu-ray disc production has set a pace to exceed 400 million units by the end of 2010, representing a healthy 60 percent jump from 2009.
Well, Blu-Rays are becoming more and more affordable (even cheap in some cases), so it doesn't surprise me that they're taking off.
I've never understood the charge by some that there is only a small difference in quality between DVD and Blu-Ray. The difference is HUGE. Compare "The Godfather Trilogy" the james bond movies or even the recent Harry Potter movies to their DVD counterparts and then come back and tell me that you didn't notice a difference.
Amen to that! At one time, I had a huge DVD collection, and once I got a Blu-ray player, I knew I could buy Blu-ray movies at my convenience, as the DVD titles weren't going anywhere.Blu-Ray hasn't failed. The fact that you don't have to throw away and rebuy your movie library like you did from VHS to DVD is a great advantage. Plus the price for players and movies are exactly where DVD was only a few years ago.
This is the one reason I don't fully embrace instant download. I love the concept, love the convenience, but I like actually owning the media. A hard copy is still preferable for now.I don't want to go the download route because I like having that copy which can't be erased.
I love showing off my DVD colelction what would I do if it was all download-able content? "Hey! Dude! I've got a great movie and TV collection check out my queue! Oh, damn the server's going under maintenance, can't get to it!"
This may make me sound like a stubborn old ass but damn it, I don't need crystal clear picture perfect HD to enjoy shows or movies. DVD offers satisfactory picture quality for me to enjoy a production.
Besides, the "like you're there" feeling blu-ray offers isn't necessarily an improvement. Sometimes, it feels exactly like I'm on a soundstage watching this thing being filmed, and that's not something I want to experience while watching a show/movie.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.