Don't think so.I think seasons went by without seeing a single kid.
https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Wesley_Crusher (Seasons 1-5, 7)
https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Alexander_Rozhenko (Seasons 4-7)
Don't think so.I think seasons went by without seeing a single kid.
Don't think so.
https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Wesley_Crusher (Seasons 1-5, 7)
https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Alexander_Rozhenko (Seasons 4-7)
Oh, good one.Sim is the closest to a baby or a kid I can remember on ENT.
Most of the time it's just dumb luck, Star Trek was rerun at the right time and found the right audience for Gene Roddenberry to sell his "vision" to (college kids in the "We will make a better future" phase of their lifes), then Star Wars came along and started the Trek movie franchise which in turn led to TNG. Without Star Wars there would have been a few seasons of Phase 2 at best and looking at the test footage it would have been spockless cheesy 70s schlock, as unexiting as TMP was at least it looked really good, maybe a bit too beige but the effects were phenomenal.Cop show shmop show. Wagon Train to the stars. What ever. That's the show at a very simplistic level. It must have more to offer. Why are we all here instead of on the Adam 12 fan site or The Defenders or East Side/West Side or Breaking Point, or any number of critically acclaimed or noted shows from the 60s? Why have these shows not obtained the fame that the Star Trek franchise has?
Most of the time it's just dumb luck, Star Trek was rerun at the right time and found the right audience for Gene Roddenberry to sell his "vision" to (college kids in the "We will make a better future" phase of their lifes), then Star Wars came along and started the Trek movie franchise which in turn led to TNG. Without Star Wars there would have been a few seasons of Phase 2 at best and looking at the test footage it would have been spockless cheesy 70s schlock, as unexiting as TMP was at least it looked really good, maybe a bit too beige but the effects were phenomenal.
Guess it depends on how you define those things. Besides today's high culture was yesterdays pop.Between this and the Bill Maher thing, reminds me just how much it triggers intellectuals when popular entertainment gets compared to high culture.
This is a good book:In his defense Ellison was more attitude and bluntness than actual holier-than-thou feelings about himself but he did love a good argument about how TV was basically a dumbed-down wasteland and only his ideas for what would make good television were the answer. Thing is, he wasn't necessarily wrong about that.
Nothing unfortunate there. Like Picard, I'm not fond of children on the ship. "Whee, we can blow up as a family, together!" Aside from a few "kid" themed episodes, I think seasons went by without seeing a single kid. I guess Riker did his job right.
Unless you count Trip and T'Pol's baby in the Terra Prime story.Sim is the closest to a baby or a kid I can remember on ENT.
Wasn't Footbeat actually called Night Stick? I seem to remember it being called that by Joel Engel in the book Gene Roddenberry: The Man And The Myth Behind Star Trek.
Also, that script was made into a pilot by Screen Gems, but was not aired.
Absolutely. Even more so, Roddenberry worked on several "cop shows" before Star Trek, including pitching at least two unproduced pilots, Footbeat in 1960 and Police Story in 1964, that were both centered around cops.
Yeah, I remember a story about Roddenberry being a cop when he decided he wanted to become a writer.
Yeah. Though I do feel like mentioning Breaking the Ice where they answer letters from children on Earth. Not the same thing as children being on board the ship, but meh.So, ENT seasons 1-2 were kid-free aboard ship?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.