Only turning 30 really bothered me. I'm 51 now and didn't really think anything about either 40 or 50.
Happy Birthday, Star Trek
- Thread starter GSchnitzer
- Start date
Only turning 30 really bothered me. I'm 51 now and didn't really think anything about either 40 or 50.
I know that feeling. I have seizures and emphysema. Not pleasant at all.
I'll save it for the 50th at this point. "She Loves You" turned 50 a couple of weeks ago, we're getting there....
I have hypothyroidism and Costochondritis an inflammation of the cartilage that attaches the ribs to the breastbone. At times it is very painful and I have to limit my activities. If it gets too painful it becomes difficult to breathe. For most people, it goes away in six months to a year; however, for some people, like myself, it remains a chronic condition. I have had this condition for 3 years.
I sound like an old lady!
True, although I didn't learn that until a couple of years after I started watching. I was seven when TOS debuted and I didn't know about it then. At the time I was watching Batman, The Adventures Of Superman reruns (on The Commander Tom Show), Space Ghost, Voyage To The Bottom Of The Sea, Time Tunnel and Lost In Space. I found Star Trek and UFO when I was 11 in 1970 and it was like a light came on and a lot of stuff I watched before then seemed...disappointing.In all my years of being a Trek fan, I had no idea Star Trek had originally premiered in my home country two days before it did in the US. That's awesome!
Happy 47th, Star Trek!
I got you both beat. I have cerebral palsy and my mom was told I wouldn't live to see 10. I turned 43 this year. Between that, and other health problems (plus the onset of middle age), I'll be lucky to see 60.
Wait, I thought this was a discussion about Star Trek. When did it turn into a "getting old" thread?
Happy birthday, Star Trek! Eagerly awaiting the next adventure in 2016.
I wish you good health!!
With a show pushing 50 its fan base is also aging.
Interesting thought is will the original series still have fans in 20-30 years when the show is 70-80 years old and the majority of its fan base is gone?
I just think it's amazing that almost 50 years after the first broadcast we still talk about Star Trek and that we still discover new things about it.
And if there should be any doubt, it proves that good stories and good characters are the ingredients to make a timeless classic but most assuredly not special effects.
Bob
And if there should be any doubt, it proves that good stories and good characters are the ingredients to make a timeless classic but most assuredly not special effects.
Bob
Well said. If it had been just f/x then the gloss and polish would have faded long ago. There's definitely something about a show that can still speak to successive generations decades later.I just think it's amazing that almost 50 years after the first broadcast we still talk about Star Trek and that we still discover new things about it.
And if there should be any doubt, it proves that good stories and good characters are the ingredients to make a timeless classic but most assuredly not special effects.
Bob
Not to derail the thread, but is this clip from The Immunity Syndrome?
I don't think that anyone is going to be discussing How I Met Your Mother or Dharma and Greg fifty years from now.
Shatner will probably still be working, though.
I've been celebrating by watching "Mirror, Mirror" a few times this weekend.
Nearly fifty years... some of you will be able to mesmerize your great-grandchildren with stories about how we had to watch Star Trek by candlelight because there was no electricity back then. And they'll believe you.
Nearly fifty years... some of you will be able to mesmerize your great-grandchildren with stories about how we had to watch Star Trek by candlelight because there was no electricity back then. And they'll believe you.
I miss the days when Star Trek was inscribed in stone tablets. That newfangled video ruined the show, IMO.
True believers know that it was Mt. Selaya....
