Trent Roman said:
If only that was the scientists' problem to solve. I'd love to be able to make my education more well-rounded, to absorb knowledge from a more diverse range of disciplines and fields. But our education system is designed with eventual specialization in mind; high school is really the last bastion of general education, which isn't saying much. Post-secondary education gets narrower and narrower as one progresses through degrees. But it's the market that is the greatest offender, and probably why the education system is, in many ways, designed as it is. Nobody is interested in hiring generalists; corporate culture dislikes people who aren't focused on their narrow, designated tasks, and there's an argument to be made for the fact that an information society makes general knowledge more readily available, and so less dependant on specific individuals. Employers want candidates who are better at what they do they any other applicant, and that means being as much of an expert as possible in one or two fields in able to be able to compete for posts.
Still, if one considers the moneyless economy of the Federation means that employment isn't as much of a concern, that might explain why we have more people who are free to pursue their interests in a wide range of scientific fields as opposed to becoming highly specialized in one or two functions. And despite the fact that it should be easier than ever to look up general information, generalists appear highly valued for the creative potential arising from a broad educational spectrum, and for their ability to comprehend and deal with complex systems arising from the interaction of multiple natural or 'human' sources.
Sigh. Is it the twenty-fourth century yet?
Fictitiously yours, Trent Roman