• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

General Trek Questions and Observations

Many paradise stories either feature a fatal catch (bliss at a high price, such as someone else's life, or the loss of free will) or as nice as the paradise is, there's a real life you have to go back to that either needs to be lived/dealt with or isn't that bad.

If your current existence is terrible and torturous, on the other hand, an escape to a healthy body, however illusory, and a rich full life is much preferable to ending one's life or living it out in pain and idleness.
 
472119402_10221479207888105_2856531825363344352_n.jpg


Saw this on Facebook.
 
Yeah but that life is an illusion, pleasant as it is

Depends what he does with it. There's the example above from the comics. Former poster Garamet (Margaret Wander Bonanno) wrote Burning Dreams about formative events in Pike's life, including a coda where Ambassador Spock is summoned to Talos and sees that Pike and Vina helped (in more ways than physical) revitalise Talosian culture.
 
Depends what he does with it. There's the example above from the comics. Former poster Garamet (Margaret Wander Bonanno) wrote Burning Dreams about formative events in Pike's life, including a coda where Ambassador Spock is summoned to Talos and sees that Pike and Vina helped (in more ways than physical) revitalise Talosian culture.
Even if he never does anything to help the Talosians, though, in his situation the illusion is the better option. The traditional Trek I-can’t-stay-here-this-isn’t-real situations always depend on getting back out to reality to do something, be productive, etc. But we’re presented with a situation for Pike where that isn’t possible — it’s either the illusion of health and pleasure, or an existence of unending horror, helplessness and pain with no compensating accomplishment or making-a-difference. In that situation, forcing Pike to experience “reality” if he doesn’t have to would just be pointlessly cruel.

(Granted, it’s an illusion he knows the Talosians are always watching, with no privacy, forever, and sure, that’s got a horror to it too. But better that and a life of romance with Susan Oliver than being stuck unmoving and silent in a wheelchair.)
 
The Discovery episode with Vina takes place after The Cage so if they keep going with SNW at some point in the future Spock will take Pike to Talos IV
 
Last edited:
They'll have to continue Strange New Worlds for quite a while for Pike to return to Talos IV.

2254 - The Cage, Pike meets Vina.
2255
2256 - Battle of the Binary Stars
2257 - Pike sees Vina again on Discovery
2258
2259 - Strange New Worlds season 1 and 2
2260
2261
2262
2263
2264
2265
2266 - Strange New Worlds season 15 and 16
2267 - Spock takes Pike to Talos IV
 
They'll have to continue Strange New Worlds for quite a while for Pike to return to Talos IV.

2254 - The Cage, Pike meets Vina.
2255
2256 - Battle of the Binary Stars
2257 - Pike sees Vina again on Discovery
2258
2259 - Strange New Worlds season 1 and 2
2260
2261
2262
2263
2264
2265
2266 - Strange New Worlds season 15 and 16
2267 - Spock takes Pike to Talos IV

Oh OK that's a lot of time ........ Oopsie on my part.

BTW I love that episode of Discovery they even hinted at it a few episodes before
 
Personal opinion... Pike's death in the Kelvinverse is a far better fate than ending up a total invalid in a chair where you can't even communicate in any way other than beeping 'yes' or 'no'.

It's like in JOHNNY GOT HIS GUN... I just don't see how anyone can be fine with someone in that kind of state.


Not sure ending up with the Talosians in an illusionary existence is much better, but it's better than the chair.
I 100% concur.

If they changed Pike's fate, fans would consider the show to be an alternate timeline, with all the usual bitching and celebrating on YouTube.
Let them, who cares.

I'd rather see Pike be "Fully Functional" or at least have a minor injury.

Worst case scenario, I can see him suffering the same way that Edward Elric did in FMA (FullMetal Alchemist).
Losing his Left Leg & Right Arm by barely sliding past the blast door, but having 2x of his limbs squashed & severed from his body.

But he manages to save the cadets but now has to deal with Cyborg Prosthetics to replace the limbs he lost for the rest of his life.
It's a small price to pay w/o having to mess with the Timeline too much.
He saves the future and doesn't change it too much.
He retires quietly as a very important High Ranking Admiral.
And they create the "Christopher Pike Medal of Valor" to be named after him, especially given all that he scarificed, even knowing what is at stake if he changes the timeline.
 
Watching The Royale, and in this episode it's stated in 2037 there was a manned attempt to leave the solar system.

Why is scifi always so optimistic about timelines? In Babylon 5 aren't we also supposed to have a Mars colony by now?
 
Why is scifi always so optimistic about timelines? In Babylon 5 aren't we also supposed to have a Mars colony by now?

I don't know in general, but in Trek I suppose the problem began when TOS was (implicitly or explicitly) situated in the 23rd century. That's no problem in itself, until you have to create a backstory with some sensible progression. And since it was also established that humans had been starfaring for at least a century by that point, probably longer (Romulan War) you don't have that much wriggle room left.

All this could have been avoided had they simply posited Star Trek to take place at some unspecified point in the 'distant future'.
 
Watching The Royale, and in this episode it's stated in 2037 there was a manned attempt to leave the solar system.

Why is scifi always so optimistic about timelines? In Babylon 5 aren't we also supposed to have a Mars colony by now?
Probably because space travel has been pushed hard for years leading up to it. My friends and I would discuss Mars missions and how to do it based upon lunar missions.

I prefer optimism, if a bit overly so. To borrow from "Night Court" quote: "Even the fool knows you can't touch the stars but that doesn't stop the wise man from trying."
 
Watching The Royale, and in this episode it's stated in 2037 there was a manned attempt to leave the solar system.

Why is scifi always so optimistic about timelines? In Babylon 5 aren't we also supposed to have a Mars colony by now?

I read something long ago that gave this advice: if you are wanting to mention a future historical date for a science fiction story, you should pick a date then add 100 years to it.
 
I asked ChatGPT to draw what TOS era Borg (and a Borg cube) might look like if Gene Roddenberry had decided to have the Borg on TOS. I was impressed with what it came up with.

Borg cube:
347a71ab93.jpg


Borg drone (I don't know why it actually says "Star Trek" on his chest but when I asked for it to draw me a TOS Borg drone I typed in "
draw a borg drone if the borg had shown up in star trek: the original series (as opposed to star trek: the next generation borg). make it look like it was something the budget of a 60s sci fi show could afford":
9292a19318.jpg


In actual ST canon, I can imagine that early Borg cubes and drones looked a lot like these pictures.
 
I won't be shocked if SNW Pike both has the accident and also does not...I wouldn't put it past them to duplicate Pike not long before the event.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top