Me too, however maybe in this Kelvin timeline she never crashed there?

Me too, however maybe in this Kelvin timeline she never crashed there?
Probably not, given that this is not the Kelvin timeline.Me too, however maybe in this Kelvin timeline she never crashed there?
So the Enterprise we saw on Discovery is from the TOS timeline? I guess then we will see Vina next week.Probably not, given that this is not the Kelvin timeline.
So the Enterprise we saw on Discovery is from the TOS timeline? I guess then we will see Vina next week.
This. I've said before that if it helps you enjoy the product more to place it into an alternate universe, then more power to you. It's all a fictional construct anyway. However, the timeline of events don't match up for it to be the Kelvin universe.Well, it's sure not the Abrams Enterprise. If you don't want to think of as the TOS Timeline, just go with a Third Timeline.
I'd prefer a clip show
YesSo the Enterprise we saw on Discovery is from the TOS timeline?
I can't think of any reason why they would show her, it's not relevant to the story.I guess then we will see Vina next week.
I'd be surprised but it's possible, if, as Tuskin38 points out, irrelevant.So the Enterprise we saw on Discovery is from the TOS timeline? I guess then we will see Vina next week.
I'd be surprised but it's possible, if, as Tuskin38 points out, irrelevant.
As if the critics don't have enough fan service to gripe about.
On another note, I'm getting Chinese Food to watch tonight's episode. I did pizza the last few times. I have to change it up.
Looking forward to new DSC is exactly like how I used to look forward to new DS9. Except now I can buy drinks.
Please describe in detail what you get for dinner
Gagh.
What sauce?
The reason I use fanboys here is frankly because, this forum has a bizarre fanboyish attitude towards Discovery that I don't even find on boards like /r/Startrekdiscovery where you find far more reasonable discussion and criticism of the show being discussed.
There is a need for Discovery fans here to constantly shit over the rest of Star Trek and Roddenberry's vision of Star Trek, mock and deride people who think that vision is important to the series which happens constantly (and don't tell me it doesn't, I've seen countless posts of people posting "But Genes utopian vision!" with rolling eyes and laughter emojis), constantly strawman and ignore actual legitimate criticisms of the show and then just brush everything away with "It's not 1960 anymore it's 2019, stop living under a rock! why would you want sets made of cardboard" like those of us critical of the show have not seen serialised television before, rather than we've all watched serialised TV and Discovery being serialised and in 2019 doesn't excuse it for being a poorly written mess.
And just like I pointed out a few weeks ago, taking the moral high ground than instantly resorting to ad homenim attacks. Another thing that constantly happens here.
Been saying this here for literally a year dude. Still just get "ITS 2019 PEOPLE DON'T WANT CARDBOARD SETS" thrown in my face.
Death Sauce. I'm typing through a Ouija board.
TWOK was so against Gene's vision that he leaked plot details.Take 'Gene's vision' for example, Deep Space Nine was all about rebelling against that vision. It was dark, had good characters doing bad things, featured a war and generally depicted the Federation in a harsher light and with a more critical eye than any other series did. Yet it is held in high regard by much of the fan base. Showrunners of Star Trek have been critical of 'Gene's vision' since the Wrath of Khan. Even TNG tried it once or twice while Rick Berman wasn't looking.
Yes
I can't think of any reason why they would show her, it's not relevant to the story.
I'd prefer a clip show
This isn't an airport. There's no reason to announce your departure.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.