Yep they've done a 'Hold my beer' stunt, that's for sure.^^ That made me laugh.. yeah this is Windows update level of bugs
Windows: Here's a new unnecessary update.
Firefox: Hold my beer.
Yep they've done a 'Hold my beer' stunt, that's for sure.^^ That made me laugh.. yeah this is Windows update level of bugs
Yep they've done a 'Hold my beer' stunt, that's for sure.
Windows: Here's a new unnecessary update.
Firefox: Hold my beer.
A ticket submitted to Mozilla’s Bugzilla bug tracker first hit at around 5:40 PM Pacific, and suggests the sudden failure is due to a code signing certificate built into the browser that expired just after 5 PM (or midnight on May 4th in UTC time).
Because the glitch stems from an underlying certificate, re-installing extensions won’t work — if you try, you’ll likely just be met with a different error message. Getting extensions back for everyone is going to require Mozilla to issue a patch.
Well thanks for the information. Thought it was update related. Good to see it wasn't that. Double checked the info I read earlier and saw that it was related to the certificate. So obviously I mis read. No biggie.did you actually read what the issue was?
wasn't an update issue, it was a issue relating to a security certificate used for code signing and has most likely been in use for quite some time so would hit quite a few versions.
https://techcrunch.com/2019/05/03/a-glitch-is-breaking-all-firefox-extensions/
Mine went tits up while I was out mowing the lawn, but using the instructions here everything is working again. https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2019/05/04/update-regarding-add-ons-in-firefox/
What a clusterfuck...
^ Most modern monitors are software controlled - both internally and externally... I.e. more complex that necessary!
The company didn’t inform users why they needed to discontinue use of the software, but the company’s Twitter account indicated the issue stems from “ongoing litigation.” AppleInsider, which first reported the notices, pointed to a copyright lawsuit filed last year by Dolby Labs.
In a controversial move, Adobe pivoted away from the standard software model to the cloud-based subscription model in 2013, resulting in notably higher revenues (and higher prices for customers). Dolby’s lawsuit accused Adobe of copyright violations related to how the licensing costs Adobe paid to Dolby would be calculated under this new model.
In a statement to Motherboard, Adobe confirmed the letter's authenticity, but wouldn’t provide any additional detail beyond what was included in the notices.
It’s yet another example of how the products we buy in the modern era can lose functionality or stop working entirely on a lark. Be it a game console that loses features with a firmware update or entertainment products that just suddenly disappear, it’s a problem that’s increasing popping up in the always online era.
Dylan Gilbert, a copyright expert with consumer group Public Knowledge, said in this instance users aren’t likely to have much in the way of legal recourse to the sudden shift.
“Unless Adobe has violated the terms of its licensing agreement by this sudden discontinuance of support for an earlier software version, which is unlikely, these impacted users have to just grin and bear it,” Gilbert said.
Gilbert noted that consumers now live in a world in which consumers almost never actually own anything that contains software. In this new reality, end users are forced to agree to “take it or leave it” end user license agreements (EULAs), in which the licensor can change its terms of service without notice.
“Even if Adobe is fully in the right here with regard to the Dolby dispute, it has the power to force its customers to upgrade to newer more expensive versions at its whim, which illustrates the undue power and influence of EULAs over the lives of consumers,” Gilbert said. “We should be able to own the things we buy.”
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.