Which apparently was very realistic..."Roddenberry's Vision" was just about making money and getting starlets to put out.

Which apparently was very realistic..."Roddenberry's Vision" was just about making money and getting starlets to put out.
Based on the low on the radar casting of writers CBS is drafting from Rick Berman's dried up well of talent for the new Trek series, my hopes for an uplifting Star Trek series is waning rapidly. The darkness and gloom trend is dead, but I doubt CBS will ever get it.I have to disagree.
Darkness and gloom is a trend right now, much of that because what is going on in the world today.
But will it be a trend in, let's say 10 years?
Not to mention that we really need something uplifting in these days too. A hope for the future and that is what Star Trek stands for.
There are a dozen or so boring "doom and gloom" series going on right now which will be forgotten in a few years.
But there's only one Star Trek and may it continue to stand for hope for the future and a better life.
What? Aside from Bryan Fuller, no one on the new series has worked with Berman.Based on the low on the radar casting of writers CBS is drafting from Rick Berman's dried up well of talent for the new Trek series,
I wonder if that is why they decided to have Zefram Cochrane utter nearly the same line in First Contact?
What? Aside from Bryan Fuller, no one on the new series has worked with Berman.
If not a realistic vision, it's at least hopeful.
In practical terms though, I've often wondered if the happy-go-lucky Star Trek universe is actually our alternate, and that we have the misfortune to be living in what will ultimately become the Mirror Universe instead.
Based on the low on the radar casting of writers CBS is drafting from Rick Berman's dried up well of talent for the new Trek series, my hopes for an uplifting Star Trek series is waning rapidly. The darkness and gloom trend is dead, but I doubt CBS will ever get it.
We started in 1987 with a science fiction TV show when there were none on the air and hadn’t been for some time. Over the last 25 years, there have been dozens of sci-fi shows on the air. I can say that we were, in some way, responsible for that. Star Trek is unlike virtually any other science fiction show on television; it deals with a very positive, hopeful notion of the future. Gene believed that mankind was going to continue to evolve in better and better ways. That’s always made Star Trek unique, especially today when you turn on the television and so much of it is so dark, especially the stuff with elements of science fiction in it. The positive attitude that he insisted on is one of the things that has made Star Trek so endearing to so many people.
I couldn't disagree with that last sentence more, and theme of the thread,if I tried.
Darkness, pessimism, doom & gloom have been done to death. Hell, 80's Sci-fi was full of it [Cold War, recession etc]. What Trek has always brought to the table has been the best thing about it: optimism. In a world of negatives, where TV shows love doom and despair, Trek has always risen above those cliches and shown us a potential future.
And that is really the point. Trek's Utopian future is a possibility. 'Gene's Vision', or 'The Spirit of Trek' is a beautiful thing and I think it is part of why people are so fanatical about Trek: its message touches people in a very real, very deep way. It is easy for people to make the usual snide comments about Roddenberry in threads like this but he still gave the world a remarkable franchise, based on positivity, Humanism, tolerance, science, socialism.
And look at the West right now. All of those things are slowly on the rise. Humanism/Atheism is growing, socialism is growing, look at people's rights and how they have changed over the past 50 years alone, tolerance is growing... Human history has been nothing but progress. Slow, painful, progress.
So to cut my essay short: I can't say 'The Vision' is unrealistic. This planet will be ramarkably different by 2150...by 2250 it will be unrecognisable from now. You shouldn't be such a product of your time to call a utopian vision nonsense that will 'never' happen.
'Never' is an awfully long time.
I have to disagree.
Darkness and gloom is a trend right now, much of that because what is going on in the world today.
But will it be a trend in, let's say 10 years?
Not to mention that we really need something uplifting in these days too. A hope for the future and that is what Star Trek stands for.
There are a dozen or so boring "doom and gloom" series going on right now which will be forgotten in a few years.
But there's only one Star Trek and may it continue to stand for hope for the future and a better life.
That's a Berman-era development though. Roddenberry was the guy who got angry at the whole Chariots of the Gods ancient aliens idea for belittling human accomplishment.
Berman, Braga, and Moore have denied drawing inspiration from Roddenberry in regards to how Cochrane was depicted in FC. Still hard to overlook the similarities, though.
That pretty much solely came from ENT, so yes it was Berman.It was Berman-Era Trek to have the Vulcans take us under their wing
Wasn't much to scrap. He was a paper thin character.Didn't they basically scrap the TOS Zefram Cochrane?
It was Berman-Era Trek to have the Vulcans take us under their wing??
If you're a white Christian male.
You know, even if you accept that 'whites have it easier', have you done a comparison with the rest of the world about how optimistic the people's prospects are - particularly for minority races?
But the one thing to destroy our future and our sense of an optimistic spirit? Becoming permanently mired in old hatreds.
brought to you by a foreign culture centered on hate...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.