Garak's complicated feelings towards Barkan are later directly addressed in Robinson's follow-up story, "The Calling."
Thank you for mentioning this story! Order for Prophecy and Change placed.

Garak's complicated feelings towards Barkan are later directly addressed in Robinson's follow-up story, "The Calling."
Others have addressed that Andrew Robinson started out playing the character with an attraction to Bashir, way, but, as Behr said, the show wasn't brave in that regard..[...]And never bought that bullshit nugget Ira Behr threw out in that "What you left..." doc that he was gay. I don't buy it at all.
I was tempted to remove the Spoiler tags because the book is 20 years. Anyway, regardless, that's a retcon that Robinson wrote long after the fact and well after his initial take on playing Garak, and after he'd been apparently told to tone down the flirting with Bashir.No he wasnt.
In the book "A Stitch In Time", the garak biography written by Andrew J. Robinson, it is revealed that Garak's fall from grace and being deported to Terok Nor was because he was in love with the wife of a high Cardassian official. Garak had been very much in love with this woman, Palandine during his time in an education facility where the future Cardassian high officials were educatded and could never forget her.
I'd believe them if the narrative was mention during the series run and it wasn't so coming from Ira 20 something years after is retroactive. As for the notion of the idea of Garak being LGBT I will ignore because nothing in the character demonstrates those feelings on the DS9 series. Mr. Robinson can now perform this revelation anytime he wishes on his youtube post DS9 readings with Mr. Fadil, and I will gladly applaud it and accept that as fan-fiction.The novels are considered non-canonical, but for what it's worth...
While Garak's central love interest in A Stitch in Time is indeed Palandine, he also expresses attraction towards men at a few points in the novel. Specifically, Pythas Lok and Barkan Lokar. Robinson doesn't dwell on it and it's easy to overlook, but it's there. Two examples I was able to find quickly through a scan of my Kindle copy:
Garak's complicated feelings towards Barkan are later directly addressed in Robinson's follow-up story, "The Calling." Beyond that, I think Robinson leaves a lot open to interpretation, including Garak's feelings for Bashir and the nature of his jealousy towards O'Brien, but the above examples are more concrete.
Additionally, in subsequent novels, Garak's relationship with Kelas Parmak is implied to be romantic, though it has yet to be explicitly confirmed.
At any rate, while the novels hardly paint Garak as an LGBT icon and don't exactly offer bold examples of representation, they also don't contradict Robinson's statements about Garak having an "inclusive" sexuality.
Robinson has been publicly discussing how he thinks of Garak as sexually fluid, as well as his initial decision to play Garak as attracted to Bashir, since the mid-90s. Whether that clearly comes across in his performance can be debated, and you can ignore it and don't have to like it, but to say that it's retroactive thinking or a recent narrative that he and Behr pulled out of thin air is demonstrably false.
Yes, I saw Ira Behr's writing credits a lot on the series and he should've been brave enough to write a story making Garak so. Too bad he didn't realize "Melrose Place", "Law and Order" and "NYPD Blue" had gay characters he could've followed suit and be inspired.Others have addressed that Andrew Robinson started out playing the character with an attraction to Bashir, way, but, as Behr said, the show wasn't brave in that regard..
I was tempted to remove the Spoiler tags because the book is 20 years. Anyway, regardless, that's a retcon that Robinson wrote long after the fact and well after his initial take on playing Garak, and after he'd been apparently told to tone down the flirting with Bashir.
* * * * *As to this topic in general, I balk at the narrow definitions being tossed around. Sexuality is a spectrum, not a set of absolutes. I know people who largely identify as straight who've had the occasional same-sex attractions and vice versa. If two men are having a sexual relationship it's a "gay" relationship, not a straight one, no matter how they behave outside that relationship. How anyone self identifies is another matter.
Star trek is a children's show and, it mostly aired during the hours when such things were forbotten by the fcc.I'd believe them if the narrative was mention during the series run and it wasn't so coming from Ira 20 something years after is retroactive. As for the notion of the idea of Garak being LGBT I will ignore because nothing in the character demonstrates those feelings on the DS9 series. Mr. Robinson can now perform this revelation anytime he wishes on his youtube post DS9 readings with Mr. Fadil, and I will gladly applaud it and accept that as fan-fiction.
Yes, I saw Ira Behr's writing credits a lot on the series and he should've been brave enough to write a story making Garak so. Too bad he didn't realize "Melrose Place", "Law and Order" and "NYPD Blue" had gay characters he could've followed suit and be inspired.
Others have addressed that Andrew Robinson started out playing the character with an attraction to Bashir, way, but, as Behr said, the show wasn't brave in that regard..
I was tempted to remove the Spoiler tags because the book is 20 years. Anyway, regardless, that's a retcon that Robinson wrote long after the fact and well after his initial take on playing Garak, and after he'd been apparently told to tone down the flirting with Bashir.
* * * * *As to this topic in general, I balk at the narrow definitions being tossed around. Sexuality is a spectrum, not a set of absolutes. I know people who largely identify as straight who've had the occasional same-sex attractions and vice versa. If two men are having a sexual relationship it's a "gay" relationship, not a straight one, no matter how they behave outside that relationship. How anyone self identifies is another matter.
I found it interesting.The book was long and about nothing adventurous.
The Line from the show by Gul Dukat "What he did to my father" plus the book quote, shaming an important lady. Mr Robinson had an affair with Dukat's Mum, and Dukat's daughter.
John was The Walrus, not Garak.Coo-coo-ca-choo.
John was The Walrus, not Garak.
Even if John later claimed that "Paul was The Walrus".![]()
I'd believe them if the narrative was mention during the series run and it wasn't so coming from Ira 20 something years after is retroactive. As for the notion of the idea of Garak being LGBT I will ignore because nothing in the character demonstrates those feelings on the DS9 series.
Ah, I missed that.Wrong Song.
I made a "The Graduate" joke and need praise.
Other way aroundJohn was The Walrus, not Garak.
Even if John later claimed that "Paul was The Walrus".![]()
Sorry, Gay Gardener, where does it say that Garak had an affair with Dukat’s Mum? I know he debased his Dad (ASIT) and him (recent online story), but I missed that he had it on with his mum.
Ah, I missed that.
Maybe it should be "Coo-coo-ca-choo Mr. Robinson"?
But neither Garak nor Mr. Robinson had an affair with Dukat's Mum and when it comes to Mr. Robinson, it's highly doubtful that he had an affair with Dukat's daughter as well.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.