That's why Jon went to speak to he, to gauge her mental state. He didn't go with the express idea of just killing her; he was going to access for himself before acting - and after seeing her speech and speaking to her directly, he felt she was heading down the same path as the previous 'mad' Targaryen. If he tried to curb her, he risked ending up on the executioner's block for treason. Plus Daenarys was already shaken as she knew he had the better claim to the Iron Throne via his linage; so she might be quick to pull the trigger on him even if he said nothing.Hated the finale.
I guess D&D were big Sin City fans. As Daenarys dies the same way the woman in the red dress (The Customer's Always Right) and Ava Lord (A Dame To Kill For) do. Stabbed/shot in the heart while kissing a man. That's how they decided to end 9 years of a main character's journey? Talk about going out with a whimper.
Jon knows that Targaryen's suffer when they're alone. D&D didn't write Jon trying to make any effort to curb Dany's worst impulses or reign her in.
Why the savage Dothraki and the fiercely loyal Unsullied didn't immediately taken Jon's head and instead kept him prisoner is beyond reason.
They no longer have a Dragon behind them and killing Jon woukld enrage Sansa and the otghers in the North, plus their allies.
Bran becoming king, is like Arya killing the Night King. Out of left field and with no build-up or foreshadowing.
No disagreement here. In fact I thought Bran was more an 'eternal spiritual being' like the one he replaced, until they brought him back for the whole "Night King" fight.
^^^So many things left unresolved and characters we never got to see in the end. I don't feel much like talking about GoT anymore. It's behind me.
I bid you adieu.
"And now my watch has ended".
That's true of any sprawling series (Book or TV) with a s**tload of characters.
